• The first stage of the forum upgrades has now been completed but they remain in a degraded state and are still being worked on. Normal posting/reading should now be possible.
    Please read this thread for more details.
    New user registrations are currently disabled.

Put a flat earthier into space


Nukehasslefan said:
I don't recall being asked to draw a section.

Ok just leave it there.
Click to expand...
Posts 3988 and 4467 were in relation to you showing how your section would differ to mine.
We were all awaiting a section, we had seen the other view.
You can't draw a section that works with sea depths and sloping world.
I'll give 30 quid to a charity you name if you can produce one that does work though.
As long as its a well meaning one and not the flat earth society.
 
Nobby said:
Back to his position from 30th October (post 3691)

"I can promise you one thing. I will never believe a spinning globe again unless someone offers me proof and that cannot be done because it's plain and clear it is not a spinning globe."
Click to expand...

fact!
 
Just wondering if we are in a sealed dome and have spent the last few hundred years burning fossil fuels, which produce gasses as a result of the combustion. Why is concern at the minute planetary (deliberately not using the prejorative global) warming and not increasing atmospheric pressure?
Another thing to wonder, why is nukehasslefan ok with the term atmosphere given its roots and meaning

You must be logged on to see external links
 
Last edited:
Nukehasslefan said:
..
You must be logged on to see external links
Click to expand...
So like I say, to scale bear in mind you have gone to both sides of the ice rim with the cente in the middle.....
That is say 18,000 miles across, so looking at your sea depths, how deep roughly Is your sea, I'm in a taxi and I'd say that it looks at its deepest point say 1/10 of the overall width would you agree?
So 1/10 of 18,000 is 1800 miles deep?
 
peil said:
The solar system as seen from distance

O o o - o o o o o .
Click to expand...
Not to scale. Scale doesn't work at distance.
Nukehasslefan said:
..
You must be logged on to see external links
Click to expand...
Where do the continents fit onto to that? Particularly the Arctic, is that on your ice/snow mound?

The reflections you draw for your sun and moon, show the light reflecting off the dome in exactly the same way that light doesn't reflect. Angle of incidence=angle of reflection. What causes the lunar secondary reflection to suddenly bounce off almost back on itself like that? You need to invent a whole new system for light reflecting to achieve what you say.

Certainly if you have a concave dome and shine light off it from the middle, it is not possible to have the light shine directly down onto the earth in a way that would not give a shadow.

Thank you for trying though, shame it doesn't work.
 
Last edited:
payne said:
not sure if posted this one before. good stuff

You must be logged on to see media items
Click to expand...
Wonder why he hasn't watched this

Or of he has Neptune doesn't exist
TBF having watched it all it doesn't address his lemon squeezer
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top