• The first stage of the forum upgrades has now been completed but they remain in a degraded state with some features missing, normal posting/reading should now be possible.
    Please read this thread for more details.
    New user registrations are currently disabled.
    Some other features of the forum are also currently disabled.

Put a flat earthier into space

Nobby said:
You keep saying that but never offer any measurable repeatable proof
Click to expand...
No need to. Anyone can prove it to themselves if they can rid themselves of the schooled spinning global model...even if it's for a short period of time to offer them an unbiased set of observations.
 

Nukehasslefan said:
No need to. Anyone can prove it to themselves if they can rid themselves of the schooled spinning global model...even if it's for a short period of time to offer them an unbiased set of observations.
Click to expand...
How can they prove it? You keep saying anyone can without saying how
 
Nobby said:
How can they prove it? You keep saying anyone can without saying how
Click to expand...
So many things that have been talked about. You might not want to remember any and you seem set in your global mind... It's for those who want to find out for themselves, without peer pressure to do otherwise.
 
Nukehasslefan said:
I can't give you anything concrete for a sun distance. It comes down to your own inquisitive mindset to decide if something is worth questioning or not.
Click to expand...
OK an educated guess saying as you seem to know so much about your cell and gradual gradients and angles of reflection etc.
Are we talking roughly 100 miles, 1000 miles, a million?

Just roughly.......
 
Nukehasslefan said:
I'm talking about my own alternate Earth theory.
Also the globe is killed stone dead with water level. No matter what's argued. This alone wipes it out.
Click to expand...
No it doesn't.

Your water level argument has been blown out of the... heh... water (I thenk you) hundreds of times so far.

Just repeating "water level, water level, water level" over and over doesn't change that.

You don't understand what you're arguing against. You don't understand how science works. You don't understand how maths works. You don't understand how logic works. You don't understand how the globe model works.

You don't understand how anything works, which is why you've made up this fantasy to appease your own insecurities, and why you constantly lie about it, like you're doing now.
 
legend7 said:
OK an educated guess saying as you seem to know so much about your cell and gradual gradients and angles of reflection etc.
Are we talking roughly 100 miles, 1000 miles, a million?

Just roughly.......
Click to expand...
I don't know.
Harry Angstrom said:
As the line between the two sticks is straight then we have a triangle. You agree light travels in a straight line?
Click to expand...
You say you have a triangle. Tell me how.
I know you're going to say you point to the sun from each end to supposedly make it but tell me how you manage this.
 
Last edited:
fyl2u said:
No it doesn't.

Your water level argument has been blown out of the... heh... water (I thenk you) hundreds of times so far.

Just repeating "water level, water level, water level" over and over doesn't change that.

You don't understand what you're arguing against. You don't understand how science works.
Click to expand...

This isn't getting you anywhere.
fyl2u said:
You don't understand how maths works.
Click to expand...
Nor this.
fyl2u said:
You don't understand how logic works.
Click to expand...
Nor this.
fyl2u said:
You don't understand how the globe model works.
Click to expand...
Nor this.
fyl2u said:
You don't understand how anything works,
Click to expand...
Nor this.
fyl2u said:
which is why you've made up this fantasy to appease your own insecurities, and why you constantly lie about it, like you're doing now.
Click to expand...
And nor this.
 
Nukehasslefan said:
No need to. Anyone can prove it to themselves if they can rid themselves of the schooled spinning global model...even if it's for a short period of time to offer them an unbiased set of observations.
Click to expand...

Every need to, because the ludicrous pseudo-experiments you've offered so far are utter failures of logic that only prove you're crap at science, nothing more.
 
fyl2u said:
Every need to, because the ludicrous pseudo-experiments you've offered so far are utter failures of logic that only prove you're crap at science, nothing more.
Click to expand...
To you, yes but then again you think you're spinning at over 1000 mph on an oblate spheroid in a space vacuum, around a few million mile circumference of a burning fire and water/oceans and everything stays on this spinning ball because of this gravity that nobody has a club as to what it is.

And so on.
I wouldn't say there's any failures on my part other than failure to adhere to mass global indoctrination in the eyes of those who try their best to force that..
The Snockerty Friddle said:
wait.... you seriously dont know how to point a stick at the sun?
Click to expand...
Of course. I now want to know how it works to get the distance.
 
The Snockerty Friddle said:
wait.... you seriously dont know how to point a stick at the sun?
Click to expand...

You've been following this thread.

Does it really surprise you in the slightest that he doesn't?

We spent 30 pages trying to determine whether he could grasp the concept of a circle, a normal and a tangent.

Turns out he couldn't.

He has the mental age of a five year-old and genuinely believes he's a genius that has seen through the "lies" of science, maths, the education system, global politics and numerous other subjects.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top