Put a flat earthier into space

[nahwee]

predicting the dome ...............idiots

You must be logged on to see external links

Seems a bit far fetched.
The light from a massive ball of fire 93 million miles away in a so called space vacuum just happens to be prevented by a global earth from falling on dead rock that supposedly orbits this fantasy globe.
Even turns it reddish by something called “refraction”
This is put out as officially factual!
Unbelievable! - unless anyone can come up with a better explanation?

 

[BigPete]

Seems a bit far fetched.
The light from a massive ball of fire 93 million miles away in a so called space vacuum just happens to be prevented by a global earth from falling on dead rock that supposedly orbits this fantasy globe.
Even turns it reddish by something called “refraction”
This is put out as officially factual!
Unbelievable! - unless anyone can come up with a better explanation?

Space lasers

 

[nahwee]

Space lasers

OK, good enough for me, I’m sold.

Space lasers

Or should I say,

Define “Space”
Define “Lasers”

 

[BigPete]

OK, good enough for me, I’m sold.

Or should I say,

Define “Space”
Define “Lasers”

Well the correct term is ice lasers there is no space.

 

[bernardbresslaw]

Seems a bit far fetched.
The light from a massive ball of fire 93 million miles away in a so called space vacuum just happens to be prevented by a global earth from falling on dead rock that supposedly orbits this fantasy globe.
Even turns it reddish by something called “refraction”
This is put out as officially factual!
Unbelievable! - unless anyone can come up with a better explanation?

@Nukehasslefan ?

 

[Nobby]

Seems a bit far fetched.
The light from a massive ball of fire 93 million miles away in a so called space vacuum just happens to be prevented by a global earth from falling on dead rock that supposedly orbits this fantasy globe.
Even turns it reddish by something called “refraction”
This is put out as officially factual!
Unbelievable! - unless anyone can come up with a better explanation?

Somebody needs to turn the carbo arc on and off again

 

[DaveH]

Seems a bit far fetched.
The light from a massive ball of fire 93 million miles away in a so called space vacuum just happens to be prevented by a global earth from falling on dead rock that supposedly orbits this fantasy globe.
Even turns it reddish by something called “refraction”
This is put out as officially factual!
Unbelievable! - unless anyone can come up with a better explanation?

Don’t be silly. The moon is a secondary reflection of the sun, which is produced by a carbon arc and crystal projector. Now I know that a dome had never been produced that can have a circle projected on it and produce another clear circle elsewhere, but superfluid helium domes can right. Now the really clever thing about this secondary reflection is that sometimes it is not even another circle, but a crescent, which appears in a totally predictable way.

The secondary reflection seems to move independently, appearing at different distances to the sun over the course of a month.

Now to observers with a telescope they can see what look exactly like craters. Now these patterns are completely different to the sun spots which don’t appear on the secondary reflection at all. And if you watch those craters over the course of a few hours and especially days, you see shadows change in a way exactly consistent with mountains and crater walls on a ball of rock, but that is just brainwashing kicking in.

A lunar eclipse might look like a shadow across the moon and seem impossible, but refraction.

It is predicted using magical maths because it just happens to fit.

All make sense?

No, try some paint thinners and have another read.

 

[Nukehasslefan]

Erm, you tell me. I was thinking about all rocket fuel used in any form of space travel that you claim can not exist.

You seem to be making the strong suggestion that you have burned rocket fuel in a low pressure environment, so you tell us.

Here is a recap of the conversation if it helps:

So, repeated question, how do you know you can't burn rocket fuel in space and if you have tried it in a low pressure environment, tell us what you used, how you got hold of it and how you did your experiment?

Or is this just another guess?

Try to burn anything in an extreme low pressure environment and it will not burn to do anything.
As for me saying I burned rocket fuel in a low pressure environment. I did nothing of the sort.

You see in a low pressure environment there is little reaction to action meaning you're not going to create any meaningful movement.
In your space vacuum it offers nothing for any reaction to the action of expelled gases to move the object/rocket.

No burning is going to happen because you need a medium for it to burn in.
I don't need to put rocket fuel under low pressure you can use any flammable substance to show it will not burn in an extreme low pressure environment.

The thing is I do not need to prove this. People can do it for themselves and physically see it, so this isn't even an argument.

@Nukehasslefan ?

What?

 

[BigPete]

Somebody needs to turn the carbo arc on and off again

Good question who supports the carbon arc?

Who programs it so it matches up as if the earth was a globe.

Taking the piss

 

[Nukehasslefan]

Don’t be silly. The moon is a secondary reflection of the sun, which is produced by a carbon arc and crystal projector. Now I know that a dome had never been produced that can have a circle projected on it and produce another clear circle elsewhere, but superfluid helium domes can right. Now the really clever thing about this secondary reflection is that sometimes it is not even another circle, but a crescent, which appears in a totally predictable way.

The secondary reflection seems to move independently, appearing at different distances to the sun over the course of a month.

Now to observers with a telescope they can see what look exactly like craters. Now these patterns are completely different to the sun spots which don’t appear on the secondary reflection at all. And if you watch those craters over the course of a few hours and especially days, you see shadows change in a way exactly consistent with mountains and crater walls on a ball of rock, but that is just brainwashing kicking in.

A lunar eclipse might look like a shadow across the moon and seem impossible, but refraction.

It is predicted using magical maths because it just happens to fit.

All make sense?

No, try some paint thinners and have another read.

It doesn't just happen to fit, it's made to fit the narrative.

Good question who supports the carbon arc?

Who programs it so it matches up as if the earth was a globe.

Taking the piss

What makes one cell of your body work?

 

[BigPete]

It doesn't just happen to fit, it's made to fit the narrative.

What makes one cell of your body work?

Who made it to fit?
What is the point in pretending?

 

[Nobby]

Try to burn anything in an extreme low pressure environment and it will not burn to do anything.
As for me saying I burned rocket fuel in a low pressure environment. I did nothing of the sort.

You see in a low pressure environment there is little reaction to action meaning you're not going to create any meaningful movement.
In your space vacuum it offers nothing for any reaction to the action of expelled gases to move the object/rocket.

No burning is going to happen because you need a medium for it to burn in.
I don't need to put rocket fuel under low pressure you can use any flammable substance to show it will not burn in an extreme low pressure environment.

The thing is I do not need to prove this. People can do it for themselves and physically see it, so this isn't even an argument.

What?

Sometimes it's amazing just how wrong one person can be on so many subjects.

The complete anti polymath

 

[Nukehasslefan]

Who made it to fit?
What is the point in pretending?

Who made it to fit is a case of going back as far as you can to find who started this global nonsense off and who added to the bits and pieces to answer the questions from those that see it did not marry up to observations over time.

Sometimes it's amazing just how wrong one person can be on so many subjects.

The complete anti polymath

Wrong to you because you follow a set narrative.
I may well be wrong on my model but I don't believe for one second I'm wrong on earth not being a spinning globe.

 

[Nobby]

Who made it to fit is a case of going back as far as you can to find who started this global nonsense off and who added to the bits and pieces to answer the questions from those that see it did not marry up to observations over time.

Wrong to you because you follow a set narrative.
I may well be wrong on my model but I don't believe for one second I'm wrong on earth not being a spinning globe.

Done your drawing yet, or have you eaten the crayons?

 

[Nukehasslefan]

Done your drawing yet, or have you eaten the crayons?

No and whatever you think.

 

[BigPete]

Who made it to fit is a case of going back as far as you can to find who started this global nonsense off and who added to the bits and pieces to answer the questions from those that see it did not marry up to observations over time.

Wrong to you because you follow a set narrative.
I may well be wrong on my model but I don't believe for one second I'm wrong on earth not being a spinning globe.

Why would they make it what's the point?

 

[ned_werby]

Time to give up. This berk is at best on a wind-up, one of the better ones seen on here admittedly, but a wind-up nonetheless, or he has serious mental and personality issues. God forbid he has children.

 

[DPTT]

Who made it to fit is a case of going back as far as you can to find who started this global nonsense off and who added to the bits and pieces to answer the questions from those that see it did not marry up to observations over time.

Wrong to you because you follow a set narrative.
I may well be wrong on my model but I don't believe for one second I'm wrong on earth not being a spinning globe.

So someone decided a few thousand years ago for shits and giggles to pretend the earth is a globe and then proceeded over the years to fool every single government in the world and all known scientists to run with this facade without one single person outing this lie

 

[Nukehasslefan]

Why would they make it what's the point?

I don't fully know the answers and can only make guesses.
Firstly it's a case of who are making the decisions.
This then runs right down the rabbit hole and will start a frenzy with some, so we'll leave it at that.

Time to give up. This berk is at best on a wind-up, one of the better ones seen on here admittedly, but a wind-up nonetheless, or he has serious mental and personality issues. God forbid he has children.

My advice is for you to give up and I'd give that advice to anyone that feels like you do. Seriously.
I can only offer advice, I can't force you.

So someone decided a few thousand years ago for shits and giggles to pretend the earth is a globe and then proceeded over the years to fool every single government in the world and all known scientists to run with this facade without one single person outing this lie

Giggles? Maybe not.

 

[DPTT]

I don't fully know the answers and can only make guesses.
Firstly it's a case of who are making the decisions.
This then runs right down the rabbit hole and will start a frenzy with some, so we'll leave it at that.

My advice is for you to give up and I'd give that advice to anyone that feels like you do. Seriously.
I can only offer advice, I can't force you.

Giggles? Maybe not.

But the rest of my statement