So on this topic all the explorers have been in on it and are perpetuating the lie as well? Rather than some of them actually wanting to reach the pole as a personal goal and ambition for themselves?
Nope.
How would anyone know if they're exploring a globe?
They're given directions to what they're told is a pole, whether north or south.
Do they get dropped off by plane or ship?
They get planted onto terrain and off they go with their compass and provisions, etc.
What they reach is what they're told is their goal, so they either reach it or die trying.
Who would be the people who know a bit more about the drilling? Shell, governments, the military? What would they be drilling for, to find the large diamonds you speak of?
I don't know what they may be drilling for. I can only guess, just like anyone else.
I was asked a question and I gave an answer, not a fact.
I'm guessing the rim is the edge of the world, that ring of insane coldness that leads to the ice dome.
It isn't a rim. It's a continuous gradient that arcs up into the dome.
Basically the edge of this world which I'm assuming is fairly circular given we have a fair idea of the distances to the most southern occupied land masses and then on to the Antarctic continent/78,000 mile ring. Given that a cross section of the bottom of a dome is a ring then that also suggests a circular ring.
If you want to look at it as water to one central gradient and water to the outer gradient then you can call that a sort of ring if that's what you're getting at.
That also suggests that Admunson and Scott were liars.
They either went there, found the secret/impenetrable cold and turned back but agreed to keep the story, or they knew before they went and faked it.
Or mistaken.
Circumnavigation voyages get particularly interesting.
You can also circumnavigate a circle.
Fellow north easterner James Cook lead some famous expeditions in the southern oceans, particular his second one that saw him call into South America and head on to New Zealand. Take a globe, peel back the south pole and flatten it out into a disk and you have those two locations on opposite sides of the disk. On a non-globe earth he would not have gone right to the edge so the journey would have been more like 34,000 miles. He was well documented at both locations so he either did the trip in an incredible time for ships of that era, or took a still quite impressive speed short cut via the Arctic (direct line).
I can't help you on this because there is no edge to what I go with.
You'd think planes would fly over the north and south poles to make journeys shorter...but they don't. I wonder why?
So you're saying Cook went through the north pole to get to New Zealand.
How did he navigate this and using what?
Or Cook and his crew were in on the lie and the people who documented him at all those ports on the way were paid off to also falsely record his presence.
Or he was mistaken in a belief he navigated a globe.
That suggests the dome and the lie have been known about for over 300 years.
It doesn't suggest anything to be fair.
It could easily suggest that people were actually mistaken about Earth size and shape and a belief that navigation using a compass was due to a globe, which is certainly not the case.
Far too much belief and emphasis is placed upon historical figures that apparently did this and that and proved a globe when today it's still not proven.
It saddens me that basically everyone in the exploration game is lying about their exploits. Why don't they put their efforts into working in Hollywood instead of Brendon Fraser getting work?
No real explorer has to be lying about anything.
It just occurs naturally, keep up.
But in 1492 when Columbus sailed west to somewhere not previously known about the powers that be had to act. That is when the globe lie was put in place. That way it puts people off discovering the central energy votrex projecting the sun through crystals.
They've even made up stuff like sattelites and astronauts just to keep us further in the dark. Extra work year on year just keep treat us like mushrooms. Keep us in the dark and feed us shit.
I mean the whole space race and moon landing was just made up just to trick us.
Instead of just saying "yes this is a cell/disc/dome/whatever" the lies, science, maths, stories become more elaborate and clever creating millions of jobs over the years, and millions of people in on the lie.
All just to trick us for no real explained reason.
Seems like a lot of work.
If you look at it from that point of view it would seem like a lot of work.
They’re even making it more difficult for themselves by inventing the Hubble telescope so they can take fictitious images of fictitious space and by publicly spending billions creating rocket ships eventually destined for non-existent Mars.
If I were them, I’d just play it low key rather than make their own job harder. All those millions of them who are in on it.
Hardly difficult.
Exactly that.
Year after year creating more work to further the lie. Started with books then the internet came along. A way to share all the information ever... why allow that to happen? Much easier to keep us unconnected to everything.
They'll slip up eventually though. Can't fool us forever.
They've slipped up so many times it's beecame laughable but people who refuse to see it will never accept that so it leaves the argument ongoing.
The pathetic shenanigans in the supposed ISS are a joke and the pretence of zero gravity and floating which even Tim peake couldn't pull off and nearly messed up in his harness.
I posted that just a few pages back.
The moons tuff is hilarious at times.
Moon buggies sitting there with no tyre tracks and if lifted into placed by a crane or actual models.
I could go on but like I said. Those who see it will see it and those who don't or won't will argue for the supposed reality of it all.
That's the nature of the beast.
You're not very intelligent are you?
Are you asking me or telling me?
That is where the conspiracy gets really interesting. While the brightest, the ISS is not the only satellite you can see. Sit out for half an hour on any clear night and you can see loads. We don’t actually need satellites anyway because living on a biscuit, everything is line of sight. But they spent all that time and money putting up extra dots to keep us fooled.
satellites are not just dots in the sky. They need to send radio signals back to earth and while not on commercial wavebands and picked up by your car stereo, you can detect them with ham radio or a kids electronics kit. With a directional antenna and three people in contact, you can triangulate where these things are. Of course to triangulate you need to use maths and as we know, while maths known for a couple of thousand years works to triangulate things on the ground every day, maths itself is just a nice story sent to trick us and absolutely does not apply to the sky. They must be bouncing radio signals off the dome to trick us too.
Just ground position stations and relays are all that's needed.
We have plenty of antennas thrown about the world. No need for so called space satellites that just always seem to work and never need adjusting or repair which s a good job because we're told they can't be reached for repair.
All very convenient.
Full of electrical components in a space vacuum and never need cooling...but as we all know, circuit boards and components heat up and are cooled by a fan in atmosphere.
A space vacuum offers none of this and yet these so called space satellites just work and work and work for decades, not to mention keep a supposed geosync orbit around a so called spinning globe, somehow.
Maybe we are all on the same level but in different dimensions? 
