• The forums will be unavailable for a few hours on Saturday 6th June, when they do return they will initially be in a degraded state with some features missing, but normal posting/reading will be possible. The main website will not be affected by these updates.
    New user registrations are currently disabled.
    Some other features of the forum are also currently disabled.

Put a flat earthier into space


Nukehasslefan said:
Imagine tunneling into another Earth to find their intelligence to be far grater or even extremely primitive. Or a mix of many stages throughout.
Imagine us sitting between another 5 or 6 that we could tunnel into or could be tunneled into us from all areas of our cell.

Maybe, maybe not.
Click to expand...
I wonder if you tunnelled in from a less developed cell who's intelligence isn't quite there yet, is there anything you're not telling us, did you get lost using your map?
You do seem to know a lot about these places nobody else has ever been to or seen.
 
Nukehasslefan said:
Because people are interested in many aspects of it.
Click to expand...
I haven't seen if you've already answered something similar, but obviously we know magnetic forces work opposite, that's why they either attract together, or repel against each other depending what side you put to each other.

If Australia and England are not either side of the world , why does the water go down the plug hole in different directions in each county. A flat earth would not have differing magnetic forces
 
The Snockerty Friddle said:
The fact that your projector/dome theory if 100% impossible and that you don't realise because you don't know how reflections work.
Click to expand...
To a person who believes we spin at over 1000 mph and also elliptically ( somehow) orbit a big near 1 million-mile diameter sun at 66.000 mph in a space vacuum, I accept none of it would make any sense to you.
legend7 said:
I wonder if you tunnelled in from a less developed cell who's intelligence isn't quite there yet, is there anything you're not telling us, did you get lost using your map?
You do seem to know a lot about these places nobody else has ever been to or seen.
Click to expand...
Feel free.
 
Nukehasslefan said:
I did look up great circles. Saying great circles does not offer anything realistic.

If arguing for a horizon at sea level by using a suppoosed global edge, as silly as that is, a plane destroys that, and yet we still see a theoretical horizon line.
Why? Because Earth is not a globe.
Click to expand...
This short video by wolfie6020, a commercial pilot, cleverly explains in simple terms and with excellent graphics, the relevance of the great circle in flight planning.

You must be logged on to see media items
 
Last edited:
nandos sonic sauce said:
I haven't seen if you've already answered something similar, but obviously we know magnetic forces work opposite, that's why they either attract together, or repel against each other depending what side you put to each other.

If Australia and England are not either side of the world , why does the water go down the plug hole in different directions in each county. A flat earth would not have differing magnetic forces
Click to expand...
It doesn't happen.

Also, do you know what happens to magnetism when metal is superheated?
Pancho said:
This short video by wolfie6020, a commercial pilot, cleverly explains in simple terms and with excellent graphics, the relevance of the great circle in flight planning.
Click to expand...
Which video?
 
Pancho said:
This short video by wolfie6020, a commercial pilot, cleverly explains in simple terms and with excellent graphics, the relevance of the great circle in flight planning.

You must be logged on to see media items
Click to expand...
What's it supposed to explain?
He's simply using a globe and a line that obviously curves over it and then offering it as a great circle flight over a globe.
He doesn't know he's flying over any globe. His instruments do not offer him anything for a globe.
 
Nukehasslefan said:
To a person who believes we spin at over 1000 mph and also elliptically ( somehow) orbit a big near 1 million-mile diameter sun at 66.000 mph in a space vacuum, I accept none of it would make any sense to you.
Click to expand...
It has nothing to do with my beliefs.
Imagine the reflections of aa disco ball moving around the walls and floor of a room. They are enough to allow you to know the shape of the room, the position of the disco ball, whether the walls are parallel, curved or straight etc.
Logon or register to see this image

Exactly the same would apply to your projector.

What we see in the sky, if it were the result of your projector, would be telling us that your dome was a perfect sphere with the projector in the centre. There is no room for any variation in either projector position or the surface of the dome. There would also be no room for a sodding big planet but that's another thing.
Even if we ignore all of that, there is no possible way that the moon could be a reflection of the Sun while moving across the sky at a different speed and with entirely different behavior.

That's without even starting on how badly you seem to understand things like perspective or vision.
 
Nukehasslefan said:
What's it supposed to explain?
He's simply using a globe and a line that obviously curves over it and then offering it as a great circle flight over a globe.
He doesn't know he's flying over any globe. His instruments do not offer him anything for a globe.
Click to expand...
You haven't watched it all.

You should before commenting further.
 
Nukehasslefan said:
What's it supposed to explain?
He's simply using a globe and a line that obviously curves over it and then offering it as a great circle flight over a globe.
He doesn't know he's flying over any globe. His instruments do not offer him anything for a globe.
Click to expand...
Are other planets in the system flat also, or just earth?
 
Nukehasslefan said:
And you're absolutely welcome to those thoughts just as I am to disagree with them.
Click to expand...

If that’s all you did, this thread would have died a year ago. It’s when you state categorically others are wrong and you are not is when you <<<intentionally >>> get a rise from others. Sadly, I think this is your main intent and deep down, you know how ridiculous your claims are.

Just my musing. Strangely accurate, but still a musing.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top