Put a flat earthier into space

[The Snockerty Friddle]

No, you don't. It's a theory and nobody can actually describe what it is. For obvious reasons of course.

Calling me a liar again. I said I know there's gravity. If I let go of something it falls. That's because of gravity. It's not just a theory, there's a theory about it which you or anyone else may or may not understand, but it's there all the same.

The game's already been given away so many times to show Earth is not a spinning globe.

In other words you're not prepared to look. Glad I didn't bother typing out a detailed explanation when you asked earlier.

My proof is worthless

Correct

to you and many like you.

Like me? You mean those not stupid enough to think that their inability to detect a tiny curve means there is no curve? Like that? A curve so small it has 000s before it?

You have to do your own research to offer you your reality, or do not and stick to what you believe you know.

OR I could have done my own research and still stick with what I know because I confirmed it for myself.

 

[payne]

Not to you, I know.

In the main.

My own sense tells me it's not there. No need for a cult.
The biggest cult is the global, one but most are just riding it because it's the official in-crowd.



I've offered plenty on stacking and simple diagrams but if people don't want to try and do the jigsaw then it becomes pointless for them. As for me, it matters not. I still know the setup of it.

Tbf you haven't actually offered anything on the whole thread.

 

[Nukehasslefan]

...

I said I know there's gravity.

And I'm saying you don't.

If I let go of something it falls.

Yep, because of atmospheric pressure.

That's because of gravity.

No, it's not.

It's not just a theory, there's a theory about it which you or anyone else may or may not understand, but it's there all the same.

It's not even a theory, it's nonsense. IMO.

In other words you're not prepared to look.

There's nowhere to look. It's made-up nonsense.

Tbf you haven't actually offered anything on the whole thread.

No problem.

 

[jedi_toaster]

Don't gooooooooooo!

Ok. @Nukehasslefan what about that experiment your brethren did with the laser that proved a curvature?

 

[The Snockerty Friddle]

Not to you, I know.

So you are suggesting horizontal means not curved. I don't think it's just me who disagrees with you there.

My own sense tells me it's not there. No need for a cult.

You don't have the senses to detect a curve that small. You don't appear to have the sense to understand that even after being told countless times already.

The biggest cult is the global, one but most are just riding it because it's the official in-crowd.

Bollocks.

There's nowhere to look. It's made-up nonsense.

Up

 

[Nukehasslefan]

Ok. @Nukehasslefan what about that experiment your brethren did with the laser that proved a curvature?

Nobody proved any curvature.

So you are suggesting horizontal means not curved. I don't think it's just me who disagrees with you there.

Horizontal means exactly what it says.

You don't have the senses to detect a curve that small.

I think I would if I was spinning.

You don't appear to have the sense to understand that even after being told countless times already.

Ditto.

 

[jedi_toaster]

So you are suggesting horizontal means not curved. I don't think it's just me who disagrees with you there.

You don't have the senses to detect a curve that small. You don't appear to have the sense to understand that even after being told countless times already.

Bollocks.

Up

“Let’s call it the horizon”
“Hang on, isn’t that a bit obvious. There’ll be people on the internet in a few hundred years using a word similar to ‘horizontal’ to prove that the world isn’t what we’re pretending it is”?
“Yeah. That’ll give them at least some ammunition”.

 

[The Snockerty Friddle]

Nobody proved any curvature.

Wrong

Horizontal means exactly what it says.

Which is?

I think I would if I was spinning.

at a constant speed of one revolution per 24 hours? Really? Maybe if you had some point of reference like.... the stars!

 

[jedi_toaster]

Nobody proved any curvature.

Horizontal means exactly what it says.

I think I would if I was spinning.

Ditto.

Well, they used a laser over a kilometre or so and it certainly didn’t hit their measuring pole where they were certain it would. Absolutely certain, they were. Then they just dismissed the proof because it didn’t fit their agenda. This is the main issue, any proof is just disregarded as not proof. You simply can’t argue against that sort of cognitive dissonance.

 

[Nukehasslefan]

at a constant speed of one revolution per 24 hours? Really? Maybe if you had some point of reference like.... the stars!

Then you can't argue for a bulge at the equator due to speed. And you can't also argue for catching up with the sun by going against the Earth's rotation as Brin Cox made out.
So trying to make out one revolution supposed means something is a struggle in the extreme.
It's all massively contradictory but then again it has to be, otherwise, it all falls to pieces.

 

[payne]

Well, they used a laser over a kilometre or so and it certainly didn’t hit their measuring pole where they were certain it would. Absolutely certain, they were. Then they just dismissed the proof because it didn’t fit their agenda. This is the main issue, any proof is just disregarded as not proof. You simply can’t argue against that sort of cognitive dissonance.

They don't even understand that point with their level of irrational brain setup.

Then you can't argue for a bulge at the equator due to speed. And you can't also argue for catching up with the sun by going against the Earth's rotation as Brin Cox made out.
So trying to make out one revolution supposed means something is a struggle in the extreme.
It's all massively contradictory but then again it has to be, otherwise, it all falls to pieces.

You really don't understand much. It's quite sad really, but interesting entertaining.

 

[Nukehasslefan]

Well, they used a laser over a kilometre or so and it certainly didn’t hit their measuring pole where they were certain it would.

Aye, I heard something about that.
I also saw one where they did it over a few miles and it did hit the board. Which one's correct?
I'll go with level water and not curved.

Absolutely certain, they were. Then they just dismissed the proof because it didn’t fit their agenda.

It all comes down to who is doing experiments legitimately and who isn't.

This is the main issue, any proof is just disregarded as not proof. You simply can’t argue against that sort of cognitive dissonance.

That goes for both sides to be fair.

You really don't understand much. It's quite sad really, but interesting entertaining.

Its a forum for a chat so if you're entertained then you're getting something out of it.

 

[jedi_toaster]

Aye, I heard something about that.
I also saw one where they did it over a few miles and it did hit the board. Which one's correct?
I'll go with level water and not curved.

It all comes down to who is doing experiments legitimately and who isn't.

That goes for both sides to be fair.

Its a forum for a chat so if you're entertained then you're getting something out of it.

One side has consistently repeatable experiments. The other has faith.

 

[Nukehasslefan]

One side has consistently repeatable experiments. The other has faith.

I've been saying it for long enough but the faith is basically due to schooling and the globe in your face every day so it's understandable. I was brought up with it until I started to question it, just like I did with Santa and the tooth fairy and whatnot but I did that early on and it took me a lot longer into adulthood to finally realise we were misinformed about living on a spinning globe.

 

[Hend79]

Not to you, I know.

In the main.

My own sense tells me it's not there. No need for a cult.
The biggest cult is the global, one but most are just riding it because it's the official in-crowd.



I've offered plenty on stacking and simple diagrams but if people don't want to try and do the jigsaw then it becomes pointless for them. As for me, it matters not. I still know the setup of it.

No you dont.

 

[Nukehasslefan]

No you dont.

The broken sandal does not become my fault, it becomes the kickers fault.

 

[The Snockerty Friddle]

Then you can't argue for a bulge at the equator due to speed. And you can't also argue for catching up with the sun by going against the Earth's rotation as Brin Cox made out.

I didn't argue for either did I?

 

[Nukehasslefan]

I didn't argue for either did I?

No, you can't after trying to use the one revolution as an argument for a slow spin.

 

[The Snockerty Friddle]

That goes for both sides to be fair.

It could if you had any evidence for anyone to disregard.

 

[Nukehasslefan]

It could if you had any evidence for anyone to disregard.

I have enough to satisfy my mind. What gets disregarded or not from your side is not my issue.