Put a flat earthier into space

[Pink Panther]

You offered opposite as over the centre. You, not me.

I must have misunderstood, what opposite did you mean when you agreed to it?

 

[legend7]

You should have just done simple experiments with spirit level and a bath instead of ruining a fine cereal bowl

Just found it actually luckily it was just highlighters hence half of the countries vanished underwater on his imaginary world

You must be logged on to see external links

 

[Pancho]

Just found it actually luckily it was just highlighters hence half of the countries vanished underwater on his imaginary world

You must be logged on to see external links

Brilliant.

 

[payne]

Just found it actually luckily it was just highlighters hence half of the countries vanished underwater on his imaginary world

You must be logged on to see external links

I can spot your error. The lemon squeezer is upside down. Newcastle fan does not agree with your model.

 

[Pink Panther]

Just found it actually luckily it was just highlighters hence half of the countries vanished underwater on his imaginary world

You must be logged on to see external links

We wanted a flat earth, not a shat one.

 

[fyl2u]

Cell.

No such shape as "cell".

Maybe it might be better to try and understand how an atmosphere can stay on a spinning ball in a space vacuum as we're told.
The globe looks good and the CGI of it is very good.
The models are good to look at.
The issue is in trying to pass it off as a reality.
That's where it becomes silly when time is taken to see the offerings from it.

Because you don't get it.

What angled axis?
The angled axis is on a model and in CGI, not in real life.

It doesn't, because they're not spherical.

I think it's a bit more than just for a laugh but I would imagine some of it has had those at the top falling about with laughter.

Wrong.
...and also...

Maybe it might be better to try and understand how an atmosphere can stay on a spinning ball in a space vacuum as we're told.

You should take your own advice. We all understand how this happens. You seemingly don't.

The reasoning.
Instead of it being a projection of a globe, maybe it's been turned into a globe but reversed as if it was a globe turned into a circle.

Wow, what a zinger.

Oh wait, no, it's just more bollocks.

I think it's a bit more than just for a laugh but I would imagine some of it has had those at the top falling about with laughter.

THOSE AT THE TOP

I have been proven wrong not once.

WRONG.

A majority saying it does not offer proof, it just offers opinion and I'm fine with that.

That would be true if it were an accurate description of what's happened in this thread, but unfortunately for you and your fantasy world, that's not what's happened. You have been absolutely, demonstrably and unequivocally proven wrong countless times. You've then continued to lie about it. The only one who can't see this is you.

As Nukey has clearly lost the plot and revealed himself as a ten-a-penny wind up merchant, I think it may be time to lock this thread, but I'll throw it open to the floor.

Nah, let him remain a sideshow on an otherwise amazing thread. We can still use it to post videos of flat earthers and flat earth debunkers while he occasionally flings his faeces around in the background.

 

[BigPete]

What happened to these superfluid experiments

 

[fyl2u]

What happened to these superfluid experiments

He's never done a single experiment, man. He's never even took a spirit level in the bath or stuck it on a raft, he's just imagined it and then imagined the result and then imagined a conclusion while denying any other possible results along with any other possible explanations for his imagined results.

 

[legend7]

What happened to these superfluid experiments

He definitely said he had done them, then he definitely said he hadn't definitely said he'd done them, then when pressured he definitely deflected.

 

[Pancho]

Nah, let him remain a sideshow on an otherwise amazing thread. We can still use it to post videos of flat earthers and flat earth debunkers while he occasionally flings his faeces around in the background.

Noted, thank you.

(btw, Tom Morello)

 

[taipeisafc]

You're a mod, you can ban me but you will never dictate to me.

You are a precious little tosser arent you

 

[Nukehasslefan]

As Nukey has clearly lost the plot and revealed himself as a ten-a-penny wind up merchant, I think it may be time to lock this thread, but I'll throw it open to the floor.

Why not keep it going and just ban me from it?

Funny that.

Wouldn't be because you were proved wrong there would it?

How you want to think.

No, the correct answer is you cant answer it. Either answer the question or bore off. You are the most arrogant and condescending poster on here. You call us all liars and when we ask questions of you to prove what you are saying you refuse. So, once again......

The diameter of the Earth is 7917.5 miles.
London to Sydney is 10553 miles.
Please explain this on your flat Earth?

No.

It’s a bloody brilliant thread because I’ve learnt so much off the clever people on here. However, as a tool for debate it’s gone to shit

But surely if I'm banned you lot can still debate. After all, it is me that seems to be the issue, right?

An answer would be better than a clue. Why can’t you provide one?

Just ignore me.

I've learned so much on here it's been great, happy for it to stay open.
He just seems to be in a particularly stubborn/idiotic/deflecting mood today.
Maybe tomorrow he will be more engaging but who knows

If everyone likes the thread and I'm the problem to it then the sensible thing would be to ban me from it and carry on debating among yourselves, surely.

ok, lets do it your way

How does it even begin to suggest that there's something not quite right about the spinning globe?

The sky.
How does the sky show that the Earth is either not a globe or not spinning?

No, go on, try and show how the sky proves anything for you and disproves the shape, rotation or orbit of the Earth.

Then have another run at showing how a naturally occurring projector could possibly display what is clearly and provably visible to us in the sky and the only thing you will prove is that you don't understand what is clearly and provably visible to us in the sky, because don't imagine I failed to notice you sidestepped what should be a simple question for you to answer if there's anything of substance to your ramblings.

Sorry but I'm staying out of answering. I'll leave it up to you and others to get on and debate.

Some of it is definitely done to wind people up. When he's doing the, tell me again' stuff it's not genuine at all. The only way it can possibly be genuine is that maybe his mind goes into overdrive/panic mode when any detail is presented that he can't follow, or the fact he can provide no detail of his theory. He then defaults animalistically to some repetitive pre-programmed stock sentences and phrases given to him by the flat earth authority.

We're all brainwashed and follow set narratives so you probably wouldn't know. Newcastle Fan gave us this info.

You try answering as many as is hit at me regularly and see how you manage it.

He definitely said he had done them, then he definitely said he hadn't definitely said he'd done them, then when pressured he definitely deflected.

No, I didn't say I'd done superfluid experiments. I said I'd done experiments and you married it up to me saying I'd done superfluid experiments.

 

[DPTT]

Why not keep it going and just ban me from it?

How you want to think.

No.

But surely if I'm banned you lot can still debate. After all, it is me that seems to be the issue, right?

Just ignore me.

If everyone likes the thread and I'm the problem to it then the sensible thing would be to ban me from it and carry on debating among yourselves, surely.

Sorry but I'm staying out of answering. I'll leave it up to you and others to get on and debate.

You try answering as many as is hit at me regularly and see how you manage it.

No, I didn't say I'd done superfluid experiments. I said I'd done experiments and you married it up to me saying I'd done superfluid experiments.

Why do you want to be banned

 

[Kevj]

Why do you want to be banned

Paranoia. Another instance of ‘the man’ controlling him and his refusal to accept common doctrine.

 

[Nukehasslefan]

Why do you want to be banned

Easier for the complainers to get on.

 

[DPTT]

Easier for the complainers to get on.

Who are the Complainers?

 

[Nukehasslefan]

Who are the Complainers?

Let's just leave it at that.

 

[DPTT]

Let's just leave it at that.

You cannot even answer that

FFS Nukey lad get a grip you are losing it here matey

 

[Nukehasslefan]

You cannot even answer that

FFS Nukey lad get a grip you are losing it here matey

I'm absolutely fine.

 

[The Snockerty Friddle]

Why not keep it going and just ban me from it?

But surely if I'm banned you lot can still debate. After all, it is me that seems to be the issue, right?

Just ignore me.

If everyone likes the thread and I'm the problem to it then the sensible thing would be to ban me from it and carry on debating among yourselves, surely.

Sorry but I'm staying out of answering. I'll leave it up to you and others to get on and debate.

Or

You could just answer questions instead of waffle, deflection and full on meltdown, maybe attempt to prove something, draw a map. Perhaps show us how and why we are wrong instead of just making the claim.