Put a flat earthier into space

[Hend79]

No proof of a spinning globe has been presented on this or any other thread.
Plenty of massive appeals to authority have been put forward.
Not one bit of real proof has been put forward. No facts.


A proof of what?


It's irrelevant because it proves nothing.





The thing is, this is basically what the global nonsense is all about. Making people believe in a fiction, so it's no different to star wars and such, in my opinion.

It's about honesty with this stuff.
I could easily use similar stuff to argue against it but we get right back to the same thing. Who to believe.
Your global mindset is clear on who you side with and mine is absolutely clear whao I'd side with in a genuine test.

Please show us your proof from established scientists that have studied for years that the Earth is not a globe.

 

[DaveH]

Please show us your proof from established scientists that have studied for years that the Earth is not a globe.

He admits there is no proof for his ideas. But what he can't to is break down proofs of why it is a globe and say why established proofs break down. It is pretty much "don't sound right to me, I'm branding it bollocks".

Quick and easy to dismiss anything with that mentality. Doesn't mean you are right. I mean kangaroos, look at them. We all know how animals look, how animals move and we are expected to believe there are really these 6 foot monsters hopping around the dessert in the middle of so called Australia. Tiny front arms and huge powerful back legs and tail, covered in fur, and then the laughable idea of a pouch to keep their babies in. They don't look like any animal we know. Look at a dog, a cat, a horse. They are different but all follow the same sort of shape. I have performed many of my own experiments to see if kangaroos exist. Basically put a dog in a bath, look at it and you can clearly see it is not a kangaroo. There is zero proof that kangaroos exist, absolutely nothing.

 

[Nukehasslefan]

Please show us your proof from established scientists that have studied for years that the Earth is not a globe.

Already done.
Simple water conforming and levelling in any reasonable sized container without hindrance.

Of course you naturally don't accept this because a globe does not allow this.
To me that's all the actual proof that's needed.

Anything else is based on examining your logic and asking yourself if what you're told, is viable.
Of course the answer is yes on your part and those that follow that train of thought....but, it's only viable because the model has been consistently fine tuned to cater for all misdemeanors. IMHO.

 

[DaveH]

Already done.
Simple water conforming and levelling in any reasonable sized container without hindrance.

Of course you naturally don't accept this because a globe does not allow this.
To me that's all the actual proof that's needed.

Anything else is based on examining your logic and asking yourself if what you're told, is viable.
Of course the answer is yes on your part and those that follow that train of thought....but, it's only viable because the model has been consistently fine tuned to cater for all misdemeanors. IMHO.

Alternatively, do you accept that if water in a bath follows the curve of the earth, the curve of water in something as short as a bath would be a fraction of a millimetre and too small to measure?

 

[Nukehasslefan]

Alternatively, do you accept that if water in a bath follows the curve of the earth, the curve of water in something as short as a bath would be a fraction of a millimetre and too small to measure?

Nope.
What you're not getting is, if we were on a globe we would be in one hell of a mess water wise.
Of course magical gravity comes to the rescue, somehow but nobody knows why. Nobody knows what it is and nobody knows how it supposedly works.

They just go with " ohhhhh it's mass attracts mass."

But it's clearly not the case.
And then when we get back to the water we then get told the bigger Earth gravity is strong enough to grab the water and hold onto it, whether a bath tub full or a lake, sea or ocean....and yet the little moon which we're told is 4 times smaller with 1/6th less of this magical gravity manages to render the Earths ocean grabs, pointless as it somehow grabs those oceans and creates tides.

Honestly it just gets more silly.
Not to mention this oblate spheroid Earth, flattened a bit at the poles, as we're told...but then it's pear shaped according to Neil deGrasse Tyson but none of this affects the seas.

The global Earth has had to be twisted and turned and warped to all hell and has had to have so much magical mysteries attached to it just for it to answer the questions that people...over time....have hit the fiction writers/story tellers with.

This is why the equations make no sense and have no reality, other than to use ridiculous distances and sizes to marry stuff up into supposed reality.

.

 

[legend7]

It's about honesty with this stuff.
I could easily use similar stuff to argue against it but we get right back to the same thing. Who to believe.
Your global mindset is clear on who you side with and mine is absolutely clear whao I'd side with in a genuine test.

These people were actually on your side, they don't believe it's a globe and still don't but their experiment proved the opposite of what they thought.
But it won't matter to you as you're too stubborn and obviously not intelligent enough to believe in the pretty basic science.
They do say ignorance is bliss so at least you must be pretty happy fella

 

[Nukehasslefan]

These people were actually on your side, they don't believe it's a globe and still don't but their experiment proved the opposite of what they thought.

Of course. I mean it's not easy to play the act up game...right?

But it won't matter to you as you're too stubborn and obviously not intelligent enough to believe in the pretty basic science.

Of course I'm too stubborn. And my intelligence will always be brought into question by anyone who goes along with the CT attack narrative. I'm well aware of it and it's water off a ducks back..... but keep telling me every few posts if it makes you feel better.

They do say ignorance is bliss so at least you must be pretty happy fella

I could be a lot happier but I think that goes for most people, as a guess.

 

[DaveH]

Nope.
What you're not getting is, if we were on a globe we would be in one hell of a mess water wise.
Of course magical gravity comes to the rescue, somehow but nobody knows why. Nobody knows what it is and nobody knows how it supposedly works.

They just go with " ohhhhh it's mass attracts mass."

But it's clearly not the case.
And then when we get back to the water we then get told the bigger Earth gravity is strong enough to grab the water and hold onto it, whether a bath tub full or a lake, sea or ocean....and yet the little moon which we're told is 4 times smaller with 1/6th less of this magical gravity manages to render the Earths ocean grabs, pointless as it somehow grabs those oceans and creates tides.

Honestly it just gets more silly.
Not to mention this oblate spheroid Earth, flattened a bit at the poles, as we're told...but then it's pear shaped according to Neil deGrasse Tyson but none of this affects the seas.

The global Earth has had to be twisted and turned and warped to all hell and has had to have so much magical mysteries attached to it just for it to answer the questions that people...over time....have hit the fiction writers/story tellers with.

This is why the equations make no sense and have no reality, other than to use ridiculous distances and sizes to marry stuff up into supposed reality.

.

So suppose we did live on a globe, nearly 8000 miles across with a force attracting mass like gravity, what would you expect a bath of water to look like?

 

[Tex]

I find the greatest enjoyment from this thread is gained by just scrolling past the flat-tard’s ridiculous dribblings and just reading either the amusing piss taking responses or the often quite informative scientific proof.

Let’s not forget this is the dribbling idiot who claimed that if the earth was a globe then aeroplanes would constantly have to be ‘pointing downwards’ to adjust their height to remain stable. This idiotic viewpoint completely ignores two things:

1. the radius of the earth plus another 35 000 feet (approx height of commercial jets) produces an arc so shallow that the degrees by which an aeroplane would have to adjust trim to ‘point downwards’ would be negligible, but also …

2. Aircraft do indeed usually possess the ability to ‘point downwards’ which is a feature that many pilots find extremely useful when it comes time to land.

 

[zinedine]

We've seen the planet from pictures and videos taken by various sources such as the voyager probe, satellites, astronauts, etc . They all show the planet is a ball. If the planet is a flat disc why are we being lied to about it being a ball?
Why are they doctoring the photos and creating an elaborate ruse? Who is gaining from these lies? What are they gaining? There'd need to be a lot of people in on this ruse. Why have none of them blabbed and told us the earth is a disc?

It's a shame there is a need to hurl abuse at the lad for his views.

 

[Kevj]

I don’t wish to imagine the absolute state of his computer desk and surrounding carpet following the past couple of weeks on this thread. I’m surprised he’s not dead from dehydration.

 

[fyl2u]

He admits there is no proof for his ideas. But what he can't to is break down proofs of why it is a globe and say why established proofs break down. It is pretty much "don't sound right to me, I'm branding it bollocks".

Quick and easy to dismiss anything with that mentality. Doesn't mean you are right. I mean kangaroos, look at them. We all know how animals look, how animals move and we are expected to believe there are really these 6 foot monsters hopping around the dessert in the middle of so called Australia. Tiny front arms and huge powerful back legs and tail, covered in fur, and then the laughable idea of a pouch to keep their babies in. They don't look like any animal we know. Look at a dog, a cat, a horse. They are different but all follow the same sort of shape. I have performed many of my own experiments to see if kangaroos exist. Basically put a dog in a bath, look at it and you can clearly see it is not a kangaroo. There is zero proof that kangaroos exist, absolutely nothing.

That's uncanny.

You're too good at this. I'm starting to think he's your WUM alt account.

Already done.
Simple water conforming and levelling in any reasonable sized container without hindrance.

Of course you naturally don't accept this because a globe does not allow this.
To me that's all the actual proof that's needed.

And you've been told time and time again why your experiment is flawed and is therefore giving you an erroneous answer.

LA LA LA NOT LISTENING LA LA LA NOT LISTENING LA LA LA NOT LISTENING LA LA LA NOT LISTENING LA LA LA NOT LISTENING LA LA LA NOT LISTENING LA LA LA NOT LISTENING LA LA LA NOT LISTENING LA LA LA NOT LISTENING LA LA LA NOT LISTENING

 

[DaveH]

I find the greatest enjoyment from this thread is gained by just scrolling past the flat-tard’s ridiculous dribblings and just reading either the amusing piss taking responses or the often quite informative scientific proof.

Let’s not forget this is the dribbling idiot who claimed that if the earth was a globe then aeroplanes would constantly have to be ‘pointing downwards’ to adjust their height to remain stable. This idiotic viewpoint completely ignores two things:

1. the radius of the earth plus another 35 000 feet (approx height of commercial jets) produces an arc so shallow that the degrees by which an aeroplane would have to adjust trim to ‘point downwards’ would be negligible, but also …

2. Aircraft do indeed usually possess the ability to ‘point downwards’ which is a feature that many pilots find extremely useful when it comes time to land.

I did once work it out and even if you did need to do this, the adjustment was something like half a degree every 5 minutes, given the average speed and cruising height of a passenger jet.

I do understand why the flattards struggle with it though and it is a difficult concept to explain. Wave a model plane above a ball and indeed it is hard to say why level flight will not see it gain altitude. But I struggle trying to explain in laymans terms how following the curve of the earth maintains a planes gravitational potential energy so it just would naturally stay at the same height if the amount of lift generated by thrust was equal to gravity pulling it down. Flying off at the tangent would be increasing altitude and therefor gravitational potential energy, so you would have to put more in.

 

[Hend79]

Already done.
Simple water conforming and levelling in any reasonable sized container without hindrance.

Of course you naturally don't accept this because a globe does not allow this.
To me that's all the actual proof that's needed.

Anything else is based on examining your logic and asking yourself if what you're told, is viable.
Of course the answer is yes on your part and those that follow that train of thought....but, it's only viable because the model has been consistently fine tuned to cater for all misdemeanors. IMHO.

You really are thick as pigshit

 

[legend7]

Of course. I mean it's not easy to play the act up game...right?

The main bloke has been pushing a flat earth and still is since 2015, some act that
Knew it was pointless though you'd have some dumb answer.
Why don't you try yourself at kielder to prove us all completely wrong, and all of the story telling scientists of course.

 

[Topbanana1]

Why did I ignore this thread before now , I disregarding the utter nonsense and stupidity that it could hold it hasn’t disappointed in so many ways

 

[DPTT]

It shows nothing of the sort.

If you regard a cell organism as a container then, yes.



There's absolutely no proof of Earth being a spinning globe we supposedly live on. Nothing.
There's plenty of stories and pictures, movies and books on it.
But then again there's plenty on god. Does that make god real? To many, yes.....but.
Thee's plenty of movies and pictures and stories about star wars in space. Does it make it real life? Obviously not...but a great story/book/film...etc with great

I find the greatest enjoyment from this thread is gained by just scrolling past the flat-tard’s ridiculous dribblings and just reading either the amusing piss taking responses or the often quite informative scientific proof.

Let’s not forget this is the dribbling idiot who claimed that if the earth was a globe then aeroplanes would constantly have to be ‘pointing downwards’ to adjust their height to remain stable. This idiotic viewpoint completely ignores two things:

1. the radius of the earth plus another 35 000 feet (approx height of commercial jets) produces an arc so shallow that the degrees by which an aeroplane would have to adjust trim to ‘point downwards’ would be negligible, but also …

2. Aircraft do indeed usually possess the ability to ‘point downwards’ which is a feature that many pilots find extremely useful when it comes time to land.

This for me also, quite enjoyed reading the “science” from posters who are fully educated and are giving some educated and informative responses
As for @Nukehasslefan, think he’s been watching Mark Sargent far too much!

 

[GK]

Nope.
What you're not getting is, if we were on a globe we would be in one hell of a mess water wise.
Of course magical gravity comes to the rescue, somehow but nobody knows why. Nobody knows what it is and nobody knows how it supposedly works.

They just go with " ohhhhh it's mass attracts mass."

But it's clearly not the case.
And then when we get back to the water we then get told the bigger Earth gravity is strong enough to grab the water and hold onto it, whether a bath tub full or a lake, sea or ocean....and yet the little moon which we're told is 4 times smaller with 1/6th less of this magical gravity manages to render the Earths ocean grabs, pointless as it somehow grabs those oceans and creates tides.

Honestly it just gets more silly.
Not to mention this oblate spheroid Earth, flattened a bit at the poles, as we're told...but then it's pear shaped according to Neil deGrasse Tyson but none of this affects the seas.

The global Earth has had to be twisted and turned and warped to all hell and has had to have so much magical mysteries attached to it just for it to answer the questions that people...over time....have hit the fiction writers/story tellers with.

This is why the equations make no sense and have no reality, other than to use ridiculous distances and sizes to marry stuff up into supposed reality.

.

I haven't followed this thread but this is a subject you've spoke about for years. And until this post, i hadn't realised how thick you were. I'd always assumed you were a wum, but you're just another thicky who has studied youtube.

Well done for mastering the caps lock key.

 

[legend7]

This for me also, quite enjoyed reading the “science” from posters who are fully educated and are giving some educated and informative responses
As for @Nukehasslefan, think he’s been watching Mark Sargent far too much!

Nah apparently Mark Sargent has been pretending all of these years just so he could debunk himself in a movie.
He's in on the big lie too
It is a hilarious thread though.
Think we're all still waiting on a sketch of what his world/cell looks like (not the padded one)

 

[DaveH]

Nah apparently Mark Sargent has been pretending all of these years just so he could debunk himself in a movie.
He's in on the big lie too
It is a hilarious thread though.
Think we're all still waiting on a sketch of what his world/cell looks like (not the padded one)

He doesn’t know what his world looks like. Just it has a dome over it, but he is not sure how big or quite where it meets the land.

Even his proofs are along the lines of “that would not look like that on a globe”, but he can’t say what they would look like on a globe so not exactly a useful test.