dangermows
Striker
Indian batsmen much better at playing spin.The post got me thinking. Why was Warne so poor in India and so astonishingly good in England?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Indian batsmen much better at playing spin.The post got me thinking. Why was Warne so poor in India and so astonishingly good in England?
They best hope they change bowlers again.Class partnership that.
Well done Gus lad, showed the rest of the lower order how to go on.
TrueIndian batsmen much better at playing spin.
*Bugger*True
He averaged 20 v Pakistan and 25 v SL mind
Surprises me that. I didn't know much about his record over there. They will judge the length better than English players which is half the battle perhaps.The post got me thinking. Why was Warne so poor in India and so astonishingly good in England?
A low average is good for a bowlerSuppose thst may add to the point. Sub continent teams with wristy batsmen who are more comfortable playing spin. Or could just say in those days England were particularly poor against spin.
Saved it hasn't he?
1that is surely a 6
Bastard was flying back to edit but too late nowA low average is good for a bowler![]()
10 will do.Looks like we will need to get as many wickets as possible in the first 35 overs when we bowl.