Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
He definitely is, you can still be utter shit and try like Altidore for example.Don't even think Burstow is lazy he's just utter shit.
Chelsea might have a fee baked into the loan that he has to play so many minutes. Just saw Fulham owe them 4mil bc they didn't bring Borja (sp?) on today
Dead easy. The loaning club signs the contract.Indeed!
Was surprised to find that out about the lad at fulham. How can that be allowed?
I meant as in how the leagues allow such types of dealsDead easy. The loaning club signs the contract.
Consenting adults and all that. They let us pay £13.6m for NDong FFS.I meant as in how the leagues allow such types of deals
A very fair questionSomeone needs to pin Dodds/Speakman down on this issue. If they’re playing players not based on merit but to avoid an expense I think the supporters deserve to know. There’s an expectation you look to tey and win as many games as possible, and if they’re compromising on that front it’s not what’s being sold to us.
I think it’s wrong. It means the loaning club are making judgements on the quality of their team based on money owed to the loaning club, in addition to simple football. Even worse if the teams are in the same divisionThe Broja one is interesting
Loan fees are common
Seems the contract has waived it if he plays
He doesn’t play and they inflate it
There’s a good argument that it’s a shit system
But I’d imagine we’d agree to a free Amad loan as long as he plays
Yeah I get that. And I think I agreeI think it’s wrong. It means the loaning club are making judgements on the quality of their team based on money owed to the loaning club, in addition to simple football. Even worse if the teams are in the same division