I'll just leave this here
Newcastle United have been named as the club at the heart of a case being heard by a Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal.
The Law Gazette reporting that The Solicitors Regulation Authority said on Wednesday (15th September 2021) that London firm Mishcon de Reya and its former partner Elizabeth Ellen allowed for payments to transfer fixers who helped to push through deals involving their client Newcastle United in 2011.
The report explaining that: ‘James Ramsden QC, for the SRA (Solicitors Regulation Authority), told the tribunal that the use of the client account was not sufficiently connected with the provision of legal services and was therefore a breach of the rules.’
Whilst the players and counter-parties that make up the case are being kept anonymous, the tribunal accepted the naming of Newcastle United as the club involved.
For Newcastle United fans no doubt, they will be thinking that if any club was going to end up being named as the Premier League outfit at the heart of such a case, no surprise that NUFC is making headlines yet again.
Looking back to 2011, the players that Newcastle United signed were Davide Santon, Yohan Cabaye, Gabriel Obertan, Demba Ba, Rob Elliot, Sylvain Marveaux and Mehdi Abeid. Those players then helping NUFC to a surprise fifth place finish, Papiss Cisse signing mid-season in January 2012.
You would assume that this case involves transfers of incoming players, but as for those who were sold in 2011 by Newcastle United, we saw Joe Enrique, Kevin Nolan, Kazenga LuaLua and Wayne Routledge leave.
‘A solicitor and her firm were responsible for using the client account to pay third parties involved in football transfers involving a Premier League club, the Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal has heard.
The Solicitors Regulation Authority said today that London firm Mishcon de Reya and its former partner Elizabeth Ellen allowed for payments to transfer fixers who helped to push through deals involving their client Newcastle United in 2011.
James Ramsden QC, for the SRA, told the tribunal that the use of the client account was not sufficiently connected with the provision of legal services and was therefore a breach of the rules.
He said that Ellen was not an inexperienced solicitor in the operation but rather an introducer of counter-parties and key part of five transactions under scrutiny from beginning to end.