• The first stage of the forum upgrades has now been completed but they remain in a degraded state and are still being worked on.
    Please read this thread for more details.
    New user registrations are currently disabled.

New Chairman

Status
Not open for further replies.

MADBOB THE MAKEM said:
tell you what I predict, we will have a change at the top, not the very top, but high enough up to be up top, in a short space of a time hop, and if that's not cryptic enough I can elaborate. cos ya see I knar what's ganna happen in the next few weeks.
Click to expand...
Someone experienced to operate the club , someone with investment money to strengthen the football operations and a medium long term plan and I could live with it. Who and how much they have to back us is crucial though.
 
Fat Mikes probably enough of a twat to buy us and splash the cash like it’s going out of fashion painting himself as model chairman and human being in the process, just to make some sort of point to them lot up the road. As I think the only person that hates the mags more than we do. Is Michael Ashley
 
Black Cat Gypsy said:
We'd be a financially stable club in the PL. Ashley managed to bring in players that they sold on for a profit and reinvested in the team. Also their academy is doing ok too.

If Ashley was owner here or at Sheffield Wed or Forest and got the same results people would call him a genius.

But because the Mags are deluded and the media make out that they are massive club like Man Utd or Arsenal. When in fact the are in the same bracket as us, Wednesday, Leeds and Forest. Big historical clubs who had their day and now outside of the "new big boys'.

Ashley delivered what is expected of a club the size of Newcastle United with the resources they have.
Click to expand...

"Net spend! Net spend! Hew, man, we didn't spend any money... Net...."

I just do not get the Mags' net spend argument.

Any other business in the world - and certainly any other football team - seem perfectly happy to sell players at a profit and then spend it. Not the Mags, apparently. Surely buying players and then selling them for vast profits over the years (looking at you here, Sissoko) is a good thing? Does that not mean your business is running right?
 
safc_grindon said:
"Net spend! Net spend! Hew, man, we didn't spend any money... Net...."

I just do not get the Mags' net spend argument.

Any other business in the world - and certainly any other football team - seem perfectly happy to sell players at a profit and then spend it. Not the Mags, apparently. Surely buying players and then selling them for vast profits over the years (looking at you here, Sissoko) is a good thing? Does that not mean your business is running right?
Click to expand...
they only got 30m for him due to the genius of rafa benitez
 
safc_grindon said:
"Net spend! Net spend! Hew, man, we didn't spend any money... Net...."

I just do not get the Mags' net spend argument.

Any other business in the world - and certainly any other football team - seem perfectly happy to sell players at a profit and then spend it. Not the Mags, apparently. Surely buying players and then selling them for vast profits over the years (looking at you here, Sissoko) is a good thing? Does that not mean your business is running right?
Click to expand...

The thing is their team is shite so I think I’d be asking questions if we sold good players and signed shite ones but were told we were a good business when the business is football.
 
MADBOB THE MAKEM said:
tell you what I predict, we will have a change at the top, not the very top, but high enough up to be up top, in a short space of a time hop, and if that's not cryptic enough I can elaborate. cos ya see I knar what's ganna happen in the next few weeks.
Click to expand...
You get a lot of stick on here, a lot of it unfounded and genuinely nasty. I for one am pleased you called this, maybe a few apologies will come your way but I doubt it.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top