• The first stage of the forum upgrades has now been completed but they remain in a degraded state and are still being worked on. Normal posting/reading should now be possible.
    Please read this thread for more details.
    New user registrations are currently disabled.

Mowbray


Ark said:
Your right, as long as Swansea had eleven they would be looking for the win, but overall when they went down to ten they were mainly defensive. Sure we would have beat them if they had had eleven.
Click to expand...
We would, cos they would have attacked us and we would have countered, that’s the only way we know how to play
 
Inside Forward said:
No way should this squad be outside the play off places mind.

We don’t go up we lose a good 4 or 5 players next summer.
Click to expand...
Might be a bit over the top to be saying no way should it be outside the play offs like

We don’t even have a competent striker. We don’t have a defensive midfielder and now our two main centre backs are banned we will have to resort to playing full backs there
 
Smartin said:
The team we have should be pushing for the top two, doesn’t even look like we’ll make the playoffs, we’re better than Ipswich ffs…. Yea im absolutely gutted, all sundered supporters should be
Click to expand...
And people say there's no delusion amongst your support.....
A point at Swansea is a decent result imo.
 
SAFC 2012 said:
Might be a bit over the top to be saying no way should it be outside the play offs like

We don’t even have a competent striker. We don’t have a defensive midfielder and now our two main centre backs are banned we will have to resort to playing full backs there
Click to expand...
We don't have to resort to playing full backs there. But people think the manager might choose to.

Nobody has any idea if seelt or triantis are actually good enough as they haven't had games. Just like Mowbray wouldn't play Hume last season and wouldn't even put him on the bench until gooch was injured.

There's comes a point when you need to give them a chance.
 
Last edited:
hank williams said:
normal circumstances yes but
Not when the opposition are down to ten men for at least an hour of the match
Click to expand...
Yes but surely that proves the point that playing against ten men doesn't necessarily give a team an advantage.
It's down to both sides to adapt - they are meant to be professionals.

In our match at your place , we adapted to the situation positively and you didn't.

I still say that Argentina would have beaten England in 90 minutes had Beckham not been sent off, the game was very open beforehand which imo suited Argentina.

I find it odd how SOME of your fans are going on - I think you (and MOGGA) are doing ok.
Suppose all clubs have fans like that though.
 
seahamstar said:
Yes but surely that proves the point that playing against ten men doesn't necessarily give a team an advantage.
It's down to both sides to adapt - they are meant to be professionals.

In our match at your place , we adapted to the situation positively and you didn't.

I still say that Argentina would have beaten England in 90 minutes had Beckham not been sent off, the game was very open beforehand which imo suited Argentina.

I find it odd how SOME of your fans are going on - I think you (and MOGGA) are doing ok.
Suppose all clubs have fans like that though.
Click to expand...
You took advantage of our ten men 😡😡😡😡🤬🤬🤬🤬
 
seahamstar said:
Yes but surely that proves the point that playing against ten men doesn't necessarily give a team an advantage.
It's down to both sides to adapt - they are meant to be professionals.

In our match at your place , we adapted to the situation positively and you didn't.

I still say that Argentina would have beaten England in 90 minutes had Beckham not been sent off, the game was very open beforehand which imo suited Argentina.

I find it odd how SOME of your fans are going on - I think you (and MOGGA) are doing ok.
Suppose all clubs have fans like that though.
Click to expand...
You had a manager who adapted to win the game. We had a manager that day who couldn't organise a piss up in a Brewery and seemingly said 'same again lads'.

The same manager made his team weaker with every change he made today. The penny will drop eventually, he's limited and incapable of in-game changes.
 
Mowgli said:
You had a manager who adapted to win the game. We had a manager that day who couldn't organise a piss up in a Brewery and seemingly said 'same again lads'.

The same manager made his team weaker with every change he made today. The penny will drop eventually, he's limited and incapable of in-game changes.
Click to expand...
Nonsense.

He's ballsed up a few times i e. Boro at home but theres plenty of games his changed have been decent. Do we have strong enough options available to chsnge things up? Id say early part of season with injuries and new players not ready - no not really. Now as some of those players look to become more established he will have more options that can change a game.

Imo mowbray is getting the most out of this team. Some better finishing yesterday and we'd all be applauding the manager and team
 
Last edited:
dave hedgehog said:
Nonsense.

He's ballsed up a few times i e. Boro at home but theres plenty of games his changed have been decent. Do we have strong enough options available to chsnge things up? Id say early part of season with injuries and new players not ready - no not really. Now as some of those players look to become more established he will have more optiond that can chance a game
Click to expand...
So you're saying I can start expecting him to make better changes and start influencing the game more?
 
Mowgli said:
So you're saying I can start expecting him to make better changes and start influencing the game more?
Click to expand...

To some degree. Adil hopefully available - far better option than most off bench now available and will have positive influence on the game. Ba is the only other attacking option worth putting on tbh.

Im not sure striker wise what else he is meant to do. Hemir still isnt pulling up any trees. Burstow not good enough.

Can you see the problem he has in terms of trying to influence the game?
 
dave hedgehog said:
To some degree. Adil hopefully available - far better option than most off bench now available and will have positive influence on the game. Ba is the only other attacking option worth putting on tbh.

Im not sure striker wise what else he is meant to do. Hemir still isnt pulling up any trees. Burstow not good enough.

Can you see the problem he has in terms of trying to influence the game?
Click to expand...
I'll bookmark this then.

Well, he took the best striker at the club off on 55 minutes for no other reason than making a sub for subs sake.

He also totally ignore aouchiche and chose dack instead.
 
Mowgli said:
I'll bookmark this then.

Well, he took the best striker at the club off on 55 minutes for no other reason than making a sub for subs sake.

He also totally ignore aouchiche and chose dack instead.
Click to expand...
Adil was injured and only just returned. If only just back from injury would you have played him?

With a bit of luck mayenda will have a positive influence but at present its gueeswork on him.

Your point regard rusyn - mowbray changed it to bigger lads up top to TRY to influence the game with them sitting deep which meant rusyn was a bit limited.

If anything rusyn had his chances 1st half and blew it. He should of put us in the lead but didnt.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top