More erasing of history...

[dangermows]

This thread man. How we've got from animals being on banknotes, like many other countries, to arguing about D Day is just mental.

MBH will have to answer that as he randomly dropped it in as part of his obsession with Starmer/The Left.

And we're eternally grateful to them.
Thanks for clarifying they were not on the beaches. Someone should tell Starmer, because that is specifically what he refers to in his post.
Then again, recently, he was unsure what a woman actually is, so maybe some of them were trans women? Anything is possible, I suppose, in this new ludicrous, leftist clownworld we've all been subject to.

Starmers booked in on a course with the Reform plumber, where he will be taught women are those humans that get abortions so they can slag about or selfishly get rid of an unborn child if impregnated by a rapist.

 

[mackinbristol]

There were women parachuting in behind enemy lines and on the front line, and involved in intelligence efforts that got them tortured and killed.

However for the purposes of today's undignified manufactured outrage, My Boy Harry is only interested in contributions to the war effort that took place on sand. Two or three of the beaches used for Operation Overlordsl actually don't count and their sacrifice isn't acknowledged for the purposes of this argument because the coastal surface was too pebbly to qualify.

Should have worded my response better. I meant that women didn't fight on D-Day, not that they weren't involved throughout the way. I know that plenty of women were involved in a large variety of roles within the combat theatre, often at great risk, and in every resistance movement. Was just trying to keep my response short to try to avoid overwhelming Johns little brain.