A
ayesane
Guest
why not like?
Voted for you as IMO it's the better composed image, it's simple yet compelling, hate the noise you have added mind...
March Voting goes into extra time
- Thread starter AB22 Easy Tiger
- Start date
- Status
why not like?
Voted for you as IMO it's the better composed image, it's simple yet compelling, hate the noise you have added mind...
MalmöMakem
Midfield
why not like?
Voted for you as IMO it's the better composed image, it's simple yet compelling, hate the noise you have added mind...
Just not what Im like I guess.
I also think paws shot is better in all fairness. only thing id of done different is perhaps try and get more land in. Not as in "its not a landscape". Just in the sense it could of given something extra. Still a cracking shot in my books like.
Last edited:
smoker
Striker
The obvious one is to shoot at a lower ISO.
In post processing you can use a Median filter, Neat Image, Noise Ninja etc. However the image can end up a bit soft.
Is it the equivalent of "grain" in film photography?
I
Icarebecauseyoudo
Guest
That'll be the wife your referring to.
& it's my bag of lenses etc.
At least it explains the massive tits noted by My Left Foot
MalmöMakem
Midfield
I usually never shoot at anything less than 400iso.
Adding noise comes more from my design work if anything.
It's different with photos, but with graphically work it looks "unnatural" without any. If its too clean or what have you it tends to look odd. Crazy but true. If you see a huge poster in town get git close to it and you'll see it has noise.
granted in my photo there is a lot of it, but that's my choice to give it a grainy effect to go with the clouds.
Adding noise comes more from my design work if anything.
It's different with photos, but with graphically work it looks "unnatural" without any. If its too clean or what have you it tends to look odd. Crazy but true. If you see a huge poster in town get git close to it and you'll see it has noise.
granted in my photo there is a lot of it, but that's my choice to give it a grainy effect to go with the clouds.
I
Icarebecauseyoudo
Guest
Generally just a lack of resolution rather than noise surely
I always would shoot at 100 or 50 if I was using film unless I needed a faster film for light purposes.
A
ayesane
Guest
If the light is right shoot at the lowest ISO your body can do, <100 if poss.
Noise on posters is added so they scale well, or as a result of scaling isn't it?
Nowt the matter with adding noise, several of the better Lightroom pre-sets do exactly that and look very impressive. Just abit over done / not required on your shot.
Last edited by a moderator:
MalmöMakem
Midfield
can be done for that. But as I've been taught and come to realise, crisp stuff doesn't always suit very large posters or design work.
I think I over did it with the noise on this photo, but just gives the sky a bit more impact as it isn't sharp enough image quality.
tom tom macute
Central Defender
Voted for Malmo first time and again to make it 11-11 to try to get AB to have to decide, but bugger me someones just made it 11-12 :roll:
That'll be the wife your referring to.
& it's my bag of lenses etc.
Hang on, you've provided us with a pic of your wife? You've got my vote.
I
Icarebecauseyoudo
Guest
Gawd it's close, and my 10 aliases haven't voted yet
It's a distance shot she's safe ............isn't she ??
Not in my eyes.
I
Icarebecauseyoudo
Guest
WD paws
Aye, congratulations paws.
That shot will go into the end of year poll for Photo of the year and $100 Amazon vouchers.
That shot will go into the end of year poll for Photo of the year and $100 Amazon vouchers.
- Status
