Hep
Striker
I'm not defending them, I've said repeatedly what they said and how they've said it has been very wrong.Finally.
Finally we are there with you. Then why are they quoting that they’ve wanted to get at least THEIR £37m on the club. They haven’t spent that on the club. This is the rub. If they were willing to sell at around the £15m mark then a lot of what you say would be ok. It’s not what they’re after though.
Their greed and incompetence has cost the club dearly. We’re also staring at a 5th season in the THIRD division. They are leeches. Stop defending them or their actions.
I won’t even go into their lies, contradictions, slurs and hawking out the academy
I would agree, the club is worth less than the £12.7m he effectively paid for it. He hasn't got a chance of getting £40m+Aye, but the fact they have spent it on Grigg (and on keeping the lights on) means they can't really say that they've added value. So if the shares were only really £12m, then Donald can't even begin to ask for more than £4m for his share. And like I say, if he's fed in £5m to keep the lights on and would get that back as its a loan, he can't just say his share is £9m! I'd suggest he should be giving the shares away for nowt and then, when the £5m is repaid, he's done pretty well out of it. Basically I've got nowt against businessmen making money. But alas if you buy a business, it's loss making and you fail to turn it around, you can also make a loss (or "your capital is at risk" as all the investment ads say). Otherwise we'd all be businessmen
Last edited: