Well, this is yet another shocking turn up for the books.
So they've been putting in the money that they said they'd pay back as a debt? Nope. Fuck that, this runs contradictory to everything they said they'd do. They owe us that money, they don't owe us 'funding' or loans back to us to repay loans that they took from us and then wiped off the books.
To me there are 3 incidents in the last 3 years that warrant scrutiny:
1: The taking out of the Close Bros loan in May 2019 at the same time that Donald paid off at least £7.6m of his personal debt to Ellis Short for the purchase of shares. That share purchase was almost certainly secured against the club via charge 000491160029 or 000491160030, which was written off within 2 weeks of them taking out said loan, of which they said odd things, such as 'they realised they didn't need all of it', and it was 'an advance on the parachute payments' - hint: The debt was secured against parachute payments, therefore by saying this, they immediately bring into play the idea that one or more of the debts Donald owed to Short were paid via this loan that they 'didn't need'.
2: The repayment of FPP's £9.5m loan to Madrox in 2021, and the method of doing so (ie: to confirm that club money was not used). This is the one that is hardest to work out, but I can guarantee you something right now: There is virtually no chance that they paid that in without trying to find a way for the club to pay it back.
3: The methods used to pay back - not 'replace', not 'fund', but pay back the debt they wrote off to the club - the parachute money that otherwise, they used as working capital for their deal to purchase the club.
There may be innocent explanations for all of these things, but I do not for one second believe that all of the above things will have been done the 'right' way that leaves us in a net neutral position vs where we would have been with the £25m parachute payment in the bank in 2018.
Get them OUT.