Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Aye, and it is a truth universally acknowledged that the best kinds of protests are the ones where you can nick yourself a new telly while you're at it.
That's it in a nutshell, he needs to go. Plus it goes to show how out of touch the Tories were/are because disco was dead in 1985.No, you've completely ducked out of the central argument that what Letwin has said is racist. He was, it is argued, specifically saying that black people are less moral, more criminal and more likely to riot than white people, and furthermore giving them any form of assistance towards jobs or other types of support would only lead to more criminal behaviour. You haven't said anything to suggest that Letwin has been misinterpreted, you've just said you agree with him. You can see, surely how that might be difficult to interpret?
It takes a considerable degree of ignorance, or disingenuity, to conflate Corbyn and Letwin's activities in the 1980s. Worth a slow handclap either way.In 1985, Jeremy Corbyn was best mates with the IRA, yet that is a non-story in the OP's considered opinion.
There is no doubt that arseholes will (and have) taken advantage of unrest to be even bigger arseholes. That doesn't mean there aren't problems in the areas that may be factors in there being unrest. As a region we ought to remember what was said about our people in 1985.
There have been plenty of examples throughout history of people taking to the streets when they are denied their rights or representation through legitimate means. Were they all morally reprehensible?He's an idiot.
Rioting is obviously a sign of strong moral values.
That's not the fault of the people who wanted a legitimate riot thoughPrecisely, but that actually sizeable number of arseholes made it all about them which took everything away from what sparked the protests in the first place.
Precisely, but that actually sizeable number of arseholes made it all about them which took everything away from what sparked the protests in the first place.
I agree but I think that some will have been normal, everyday people who ended up rioting because of the anger about the social conditions they lived and how they were mistreated because of institutional racism that existed, Letwin's comments reflect this as a fact.Precisely, but that actually sizeable number of arseholes made it all about them which took everything away from what sparked the protests in the first place.
Didn't you have an appearance in front of the beak for confusing riot and protest?There have been plenty of examples throughout history of people taking to the streets when they are denied their rights or representation through legitimate means. Were they all morally reprehensible?
That's not the fault of the people who wanted a legitimate riot though![]()
It wasn't me who confused the two. It was plod.Didn't you have an appearance in front of the beak for confusing riot and protest?
Guilty or not guilty?It wasn't me who confused the two. It was plod.
And the Tories thought Mandela was terrorist but Pinochet was a hero. Work that one out.In 1985, Jeremy Corbyn was best mates with the IRA, yet that is a non-story in the OP's considered opinion.
Mandela was a terroristAnd the Tories thought Mandela was terrorist but Pinochet was a hero. Work that one out.
So calling someone a best mate of Mandela or ANC sympathiser would be a massive insult then?Mandela was a terrorist
No, I'm pretty certain I didn't say or even imply that. Mandela was a terrorist. That is an indisputable fact.So calling someone a best mate of Mandela or ANC sympathiser would be a massive insult then?
Not guilty but Bound Over. Work that one out.Guilty or not guilty?
So by extension any friend or supporter of his is a terrorist sympathiserNo, I'm pretty certain I didn't say or even imply that. Mandela was a terrorist. That is an indisputable fact.
Guilty as fuckNot guilty but Bound Over. Work that one out.
Are you missing a ? Or is that a statement?So by extension any friend or supporter of his is a terrorist sympathiser