• The forum upgrades are now largely complete.
    Please read this thread for more details.
    New user registrations are currently disabled.

Kolpakers and Brexit

Status
Not open for further replies.

brandon

Striker
Sorry that it’s a Mail article :oops:



Brexit threat to Kolpak cricketers as ECB warns they won't be able to play in UK beyond 2020 with no-deal
Logon or register to see this image


The ECB has warned the 18 first-class counties that Kolpak cricketers will no longer be eligible to play here domestically beyond the end of the 2020 season if the UK completes a no-deal this year.

The governing body have circulated an email listing likely scenarios for players currently qualified to participate here as locals by virtue of a Kolpak registration or the holding of an EU passport.

In the event of a no-deal Brexit either on October 31 or the following two months, it has been advised that new applications for the registration of Kolpak/EU cricketers under regulation 2 of the ECB's protocols would become void with immediate effect.

Logon or register to see this image

Duanne Olivier (pictured) is one of the players who would be affected by a no-deal Brexit

WHAT IS A KOLPAK DEAL?
Ruling was created by the European Court of Justice in 2003 after Slovakian handball player Maros Kolpak initially lost his contract at a German club as they already had two non-EU players. Court ruled in his favour and allowed citizens of countries that had fair trade treaties with the EU, to work in any EU country.

Ruling allows citizens of around 100 nations to play cricket in any EU nation without being considered an overseas player. South African Claude Henderson became the first cricketer to sign a Kolpak agreement, joining Leicestershire in 2004.

Under the proposals, those already contracted here will be permitted to continue under their existing terms for 2020 - provided they remain at their current clubs - but it has been advised that any transition period must end in conjunction with the government's Brexit transition period on December 31 next year.

Even if a Brexit deal is struck before the end of 2020, the 40-or-so county cricketers affected by the directives would not have their grace period extended, meaning that all existing deals will be cancelled and they could only continue here as overseas players.

It is understood that the highest-profile of a raft of recent Kolpak recruits, the fast bowler Duanne Olivier - who sensationally revealed to Sportsmail earlier this year that he wanted to pursue a Test career with England after turning his back on South Africa - has a clause in his three-year contract with Yorkshire that would trigger an immediate switch to overseas status in such an outcome, enabling him to fulfil his commitments at Headingley.

Dual national players who hold British passports will continue to be eligible for registration regardless but the future for Kolpaks, plus those with EU passports or ancestry visas, looks bleak.


Morne Morkel is another Kolpak player who would be unable to play in event of no-deal Brexit
KOLPAK CRICKETERS IN LAST THREE YEARS
2019: Duanne Olivier (Yorkshire)

2018: Wayne Parnell (Worcestershire), Blessing Muzarabani (Northamptonshire), Morne Morkel (Surrey), Heino Kuhn (Kent)

2017: Shivnarine Chanderpaul (Lancashire), Marchant de Lange (Glamorgan), Rilee Rossouw (Hampshire), Kyle Abbott (Hampshire), Grant Elliott (Warwickshire), Daryn Smit (Derbyshire), David Wiese (Sussex), Tino Best (Hampshire)

The ECB are known to have taken legal advice before issuing their correspondence while the Professional Cricketers' Association have in turn offered their members the chance to speak to a lawyer for advice.

Kolpak players - hailing from southern Africa and the Caribbean - first arrived here in 2004, the year after handball goalkeeper Maros Kolpak made a successful challenge to the European Court of Justice to allow him to continue playing in Germany as a local due to a trade agreement his native Slovakia held with the EU.

Claude Henderson, a spinner with seven Test caps was cricket's pioneer with Leicestershire, using Kolpak's same argument and the terms of the Cotonou Agreement, a trade deal signed between the EU and 78 countries including South Africa that promoted equal rights to their citizens as held by their European equivalents.

The initial flood caused a problem for the ECB, not least when some teams fielded up to half a dozen southern Africans in their XIs, which was countered by a stiffening of the qualification criteria, working in conjunction with the Home Office.

Since 2009, only those players with a Test cap in the preceding 12 months or five in the previous five years have been able to turn 'Kolpak'.

Although that has undoubtedly led to an increase in the standard of county cricket, lured by opportunities to cash in on he strength of sterling compared to their own weak rand, it has also ripped players of the calibre of Olivier, Kyle Abbott and Rilee Rossouw from the bosom of the South Africa team.

It will, however, barring successful legal challenges, be a thing of the past from the 2021 season onwards in any Brexit secured by Boris Johnson's new administration.
 
Last edited:

Can't deal with sharing a surname with such a high profile ****, not now he's "PM Johnson" (fuck that's me dad's initials :eek:). Hope it doesn't last too long.
 
So they need a work visa, and to get that they need to be a good player shrugs.

Or have a British parent or grandparent.

Don't worry, I know people want Hampfrica to prosper, I'm sure they'll find a way.
 
Have always been uncomfortable with the amount of Kolpaks in our game tbh, counties have taken it as an easy way out to recruit a test quality player by offering them more financial incentive than their country can or will, at the expense of developing young English talent. In a lot of cases, the recruits have been average county players who are simply blocking a route for a young English lad, and that can't be good for the International side.

Hampshire are an absolute disgrace for it recently but every county has used the rule to their own benefit.
 
Last edited:
Have always been uncomfortable with the amount of Kolpaks in our game tbh, counties have taken it as an easy way out to recruit a test quality player by offering them more financial incentive than their country can or will, at the expense of developing young English talent. In a lot of cases, the recruits have been average county players who are simply blocking a route for a young English lad, and that can't be good for the International side.

Hampshire are an absolute disgrace for it recently but every county has used the rule to their own benefit.
If we're talking immigration policy, which we certainly shouldn't because this isn't a politics forum ... brexit notwithstanding Boris is pretty socially liberal especially on immigration who else would have said that they'd like an amnesty for illegals. ,..,., So, in terms of Kolpaks, it's all to play for.

If the ECB wants them they should start lobbying. At least all they'd have to do is get a bus across town instead of an airplane to Brussels.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top