• The forums will be unavailable for a few hours on Saturday 6th June, when they do return they will initially be in a degraded state with some features missing, but normal posting/reading will be possible. The main website will not be affected by these updates.
    New user registrations are currently disabled.
    Some other features of the forum are also currently disabled.

Juan Sartori

Status
Not open for further replies.
the reason lots of people go into football club ownership is he newtworking..the west ham owners have in the past said that while they dont expect to make a direct profit from football..the amount of business deals they got from contacts amongdirectors at other clubs means they are way ahead.

The point you make re: Methven being there, and it being a concern, is indeed valid, Im not in any way disagreeing with you. But Methvens experience of working for champions league clubs means lots of football clubs would want to him for that reason alone, and he, they. But the SAFC clobber he is wearing does add to the mystery.
Working for champions league clubs, I wouldn’t let the clown work for a Sunday morning football club.
 

Working for champions league clubs, I wouldn’t let the clown work for a Sunday morning football club.
aye well you dont work for a champions league club..those that hired him did
You'd think the new regime would have been savvy enough to not be wheeling old Charlie out in public, knowing how fans think about him and Donald?

Very strange carry on, and just builds up more animosity when we're in such bad form on the pitch.
this is the best post on this thread
 
You'd think the new regime would have been savvy enough to not be wheeling old Charlie out in public, knowing how fans think about him and Donald?

Very strange carry on, and just builds up more animosity when we're in such bad form on the pitch.

Or you’d think the old regime who are still involved would be savvy enough to know they’re not all that popular so would keep a very low profile and not pose for photos on the other side of the world with the head of our recruitment.
 
his tweet is very inacurrate...sartori and kld clearly dont have

methven is definitely a former director..yunless you think he has committed the criminal offence of knowingly filing an inacurrate statement to companies house? But he is a shareholder and he is mates with sartori. I agree its a concern that this has happened, but also people may be going over the top saying methven is running the place.
Again you know everything about Safc and shares although you are not a huge fan, mind boggling, also seen you say in a later one Metvhen has worked for loads of football clubs, honestly I can’t stop laughing 😂😂😂😂😂
 
Again you know everything about Safc and shares although you are not a huge fan, mind boggling, also seen you say in a later one Metvhen has worked for loads of football clubs, honestly I can’t stop laughing 😂😂😂😂😂
i said nothing in my post that impies i know anything about safc sharelding exceot what is in official documents..
as for methven...and where e has worked..again publically disclosed.
 
i said nothing in my post that impies i know anything about safc sharelding exceot what is in official documents..
as for methven...and where e has worked..again publically disclosed.
In earlier post you said Satori and KLD don’t have equal shares, then say KLD didn’t file share issue report on his shares so basically you know as much as the next man, unless you are Charlie like me and plenty others suspect.
Ps if you are, sling you’re hook, you never paid for shares in Safc in the first place, you got them for coming up with the plan to pay ES the parachute payments you leech.
 
In earlier post you said Satori and KLD don’t have equal shares, then say KLD didn’t file share issue report on his shares so basically you know as much as the next man, unless you are Charlie like me and plenty others suspect.
Ps if you are, sling you’re hook, you never paid for shares in Safc in the first place, you got them for coming up with the plan to pay ES the parachute payments you leech.
becaise while theydidnt file a share issue report..a confirmation statement..they did file a report onfirming that KLD is now a person of significant control..without givving the number..but the minimum it can be for it to be a person of significnt control is 50 oer cent..so sartori and KLD cant oth have 50 if donald and methven are shareholders.
Give the **** his quid back 😡
its the3 million he pts in he wants back?
 
becaise while theydidnt file a share issue report..a confirmation statement..they did file a report onfirming that KLD is now a person of significant control..without givving the number..but the minimum it can be for it to be a person of significnt control is 50 oer cent..so sartori and KLD cant oth have 50 if donald and methven are shareholders.

its the3 million he pts in he wants back?
How do you know I don’t work for a champions league club ?
 
becaise while theydidnt file a share issue report..a confirmation statement..they did file a report onfirming that KLD is now a person of significant control..without givving the number..but the minimum it can be for it to be a person of significnt control is 50 oer cent..so sartori and KLD cant oth have 50 if donald and methven are shareholders.

its the3 million he pts in he wants back?
Very clever yeh, a man who ain’t that bothered about Safc looks at all the shareholding’s statements really and no answer on if you are Charlie or if you believe he deserves his shares.
Don’t bother, you will deny you are him, but sure you will say he deserves them.
Charlie Metvhen worked for lots of football clubs, still can’t get over that.
😆😆😆😆😂😂😂😆😆😆
 
becaise while theydidnt file a share issue report..a confirmation statement..they did file a report onfirming that KLD is now a person of significant control..without givving the number..but the minimum it can be for it to be a person of significnt control is 50 oer cent..so sartori and KLD cant oth have

Most PSCs are those who hold:

more than 25% of shares in the company

more than 25% of voting rights in the company

the right to appoint or remove the majority of the board of directors
 
The purchase price was quite clearly £37 million. Its a complete irrelevance what the seller did with that money tbh. Saying donald has put in cash over and above the purchase price feels disingenuous at best.
Absolutely spot on, it’s just my opinion but think there is a very strong chance Donald made his money back and more from selling only part of the shares he had.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top