AC Mack
Striker
That list you made above are all 'either way' decisions except for the penalty.
He was shite, mind.
-
The first stage of the forum upgrades has now been completed but they remain in a degraded state and are still being worked on. Normal posting/reading should now be possible.
Please read this thread for more details.
New user registrations are currently disabled.
Jared Gillet
- Thread starter DonaldDownTheWing
- Start date
That list you made above are all 'either way' decisions except for the penalty.
He was shite, mind.
They are all f***ing shite man, every last one of them. Im not sure why they just don't get gobshites from forums like this to do the job
Mowgli
Striker
You aren't even allowed to say he was shite though, because other refs have made a mistake in history.
Theres no sensible debate around criticising the performances from either side on here. Its a total waste of time.
AC Mack
Striker
Mowgli
Striker
Its a very difficult job but sometimes you just can't sit there and defend them.
I'd love to know what his reasoning is from standing 5 yards from the penalty and not giving it. Then VAR also didn't get involved.
not down to pace of the game, not down to obstruction. Absolutely bizarre. Is he applying his own laws because its too early?
You'll get criticism for it though.I am and just have
Last edited:
I've said the penalty call was awful and there's no excuse for it. How's that not criticising him and the var officials?
Mowgli
Striker
You generally add on a defence to it and every ref makes mistakes etc etc. Theres always a caveat.
We've get a nice apology because the var should have stepped in but for some inexplicable reason, he didn't.
Well the caveat is relevant when you' and others are saying hes not good enough, shite etc etc etc
good at his job? i don't usually post smilies on here but
Johnny Gently
Central Defender
Quite possibly, or just a troll, seems a very condescending chap, like his hero Jared.
So are you saying he's a good referee?
Last edited:
taipeisafc
Striker
To be honest I was baffled by VAR - referees have a split second to make a decision and get stuff wrong. But VAR have time and various reviews and for them to say "normal contact" is utterly baffling. The goal by Evanilson is one of those that is a bit like Umpires Call in cricket - if the referree had disallowed it it would probably have stayed disallowed but he gave it, from the replays I saw it might have brushed his hand on the way up to his should or hit him just below the elbow but couldn't really say for sure either way.
viccarlton
Striker
Travelled here from Australia to behave like an absolute clown whilst professing to be a competent match official?
Geras
Midfield
So what do you suggest happens now we've reached a point where you agree 'inexcusable' officiating occurred? Because your answer to date has been " nothing" .
Voice of fair play
Striker
I could add to this debate and state the absolute obvious, logical and common sense view.
Which is if a ref starts out from the bottom of his profession and in a diffrent country and moves all his way up to the top of his profession, therefore ending up in the best league in the world.
He must have been a good ref in a reasonably lot of games?
That’s common sense and logical.
but of course that often in short supply on here when mistakes are remembered for years and good games forgotten in seconds
Which is if a ref starts out from the bottom of his profession and in a diffrent country and moves all his way up to the top of his profession, therefore ending up in the best league in the world.
He must have been a good ref in a reasonably lot of games?
That’s common sense and logical.
but of course that often in short supply on here when mistakes are remembered for years and good games forgotten in seconds
tunstallhill
Striker
if you look at each incident on an individual basis, then the penna call is 100% wrong, and the rest are 80/20 or 60/40 etc... fair enough
other than the added time, which he is 100% wrong about
so two major decisions 100% wrong.
but if you look at the game as a whole, instead of broken down into individual instances, then his performance becomes absolutely woeful.
there was a quite a few 50/50 shoulder charges that one minute he gave, the next minute he didn't. each one is a debatable decisions fair enough, but the lack of consistency means that he 100% got some of the wrong, as the same incident 5 minutes later he called the opposite way.
he had zero control over the game. stopping the game to bring players over to talk to him whilst others were screaming and shouting at him, meaning the play stopped for ages. then apparently he booked sadiki for bad-mouthing him. again, total lack of consistency. the players were running rings around him.
SAFC Wilks
Striker
I think he just wants you to say that Gillet is shit. Not that he’s made one single bad error in your opinion but that he’s shit.
Do it, Rob. Say Gillet is a shit referee.
tunstallhill
Striker
he must have done something right in his career, but that counted for fuck all last saturday. he was absolutely woeful. his attitude towards the game, the fans, the players is disgusting.
his level is a couple of steps down from the premier league where there is less spotlight.
the bloke simply does not have the professionalism and respect for the game that is required at that level
Voice of fair play
Striker
Personally I think it’s straightforward what should happen imo, is that it should be treat like a forward missing a inexcusable chance or a keeper letting in a inexcusable goal.
If they have been poor up to that point drop them, but if they have had a lot of good games to offset that mistake keep them.
In short what should happen to refs and footballers is all performances should be taken into account not just the particular mistake.
I think that both fair and sensible
I think there is no disputing he was extremely bad on Saturday but the above post I have just posted should occur imo when assessing anyone.
Last edited:
Geras
Midfield
No mate , this ones inexcusable, inexplicable dont forget , not a percentage thing its a serious error for which no obvious cause can be found . Physical execution is always excusable by its nature.
Would you excuse a surgeon for a serious inexplicable error , or a police officer or a gas engineer ? Because overall they were ok ?
Last edited:
Haven't all officals had similar games though? Are any of them capable of refereeing in the premier league in your opinion. I mean how ofter do study has offiacting? Away from sunderland games do you keep tabs on him? I referenced earlier i seen he do Leeds v Man Utd earlier this year and he was excellent. How does that tie in with him not been up for the job?
