Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Roefs tried to throw his body across him to make it look like a foul. Really, it was Roefs arm outstretched stopping their lad getting to the ball. Will take it especially after that dreadful penalty decision but to me we got off with one there.What you on about? Roefs was fouled. You seem desperate for this ref to give them something mind. Almost like you don't like us moaning about this ref.
‘Normal contact’ according to VAR apparently.He'll make up some shite excuse like he usually does.
Fair play.Just so im not accused of hiding away it was a definite penalty. I can sort of understand why Gillet may have thought he gone down to easy but no excuse for var not to pick it up
On the Roefs it was a pure 50/50 call and we could have no complaints if the foul wasn't given
Nah you come across as someone who likes to have ‘being robbed’ as a comfort blanket. Blatant penalty to us but we got away with one there.What you on about? Roefs was fouled. You seem desperate for this ref to give them something mind. Almost like you don't like us moaning about this ref.
Roefs wasn’t fouled likeWhat you on about? Roefs was fouled. You seem desperate for this ref to give them something mind. Almost like you don't like us moaning about this ref.
The Roefs situation wasn't even a call. I don't think anybody is really disputing it. Of course it was a foul. Your the first person to even suggest it's a talking point, except from a few desperate half hearted protests at the time from Bournemouth.Just so im not accused of hiding away it was a definite penalty. I can sort of understand why Gillet may have thought he gone down to easy but no excuse for var not to pick it up
On the Roefs it was a pure 50/50 call and we could have no complaints if the foul wasn't given
Not at all. Are you saying Roefs should've got penalised for a foul?Nah you come across as someone who likes to have ‘being robbed’ as a comfort blanket. Blatant penalty to us but we got away with one there.
Sunderland v Fulham wasn't even discussed on Monday, unless i missed itI hope they ask Dermot Gallagher on that ref watch why they wouldn’t give that. It’s inexcusable.
Nah you come across as someone who likes to have ‘being robbed’ as a comfort blanket. Blatant penalty to us but we got away with one there.
What you on about? Roefs was fouled. You seem desperate for this ref to give them something mind. Almost like you don't like us moaning about this ref.
The Roefs situation wasn't even a call. I don't think anybody is really disputing it. Of course it was a foul. Your the first person to even suggest it's a talking point, except from a few desperate half hearted protests at the time from Bournemouth.
Seriously?This thread has plenty of people disputing, the commentators on TNT thought it could have went either way.
Fair playJust so im not accused of hiding away it was a definite penalty. I can sort of understand why Gillet may have thought he gone down to easy but no excuse for var not to pick it up
On the Roefs it was a pure 50/50 call and we could have no complaints if the foul wasn't given