MurtonMark
Midfield
No it isn't. Adding the action or process of adding something to something else. We sold one player and signed multiple.
Agreed.
And the squad got worse.
And the balance of the money has seemingly disappeared in to the ether.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
No it isn't. Adding the action or process of adding something to something else. We sold one player and signed multiple.
Agreed.
30m plus Broadhead30m upfront or piss off.
It will need to be a massive one considering Spurs want a chunk of any fee we getIpswich formal bid - source Times
And Ipswich have offered 15 mill for Clarke…..Rowe isn’t even close to being at clarkes levelOn his way to Marseille £14m plus add ons.
No, but he mightHas he gone like?
I know. But that's what the Ross Stewart money was spent on. The fact is that when we sold a player we reinvested the money.
Don't forget Spurs sell on percentage.Yeah. Says that Ipswich have made a bid of £15m up front with add ons to take it close to £20m and that that’s likely to test our resolve
Stewart hadn't played for the best part of a year; the club did well to get the fee they got for him. The players they added with the funds haven't yet proven successful but it's objective that when we've sold a player for a good fee, we've bought other players with the money. That can't be argued.And the squad got worse.
And the balance of the money has seemingly disappeared in to the ether.
He might notNo, but he might![]()
I think every fan is aware by now what the plans and ideas are of the people running the football club. I've got no issue with it but it does sometimes leave you feeling there's a real missed opportunity.
I dont think any fan is getting the wool pulled over their eyes at this point though.
Do one butty wagon you smelly oaf.Clarkes not gan to Ipswhich
We have business people in charge of our football club now not pissy panted little boys. If we got £8m + add ons for an injured player with 1 year left on his contract why do you think they'd be "terrified" of having to make a good deal for one of the best players in the league?They'll probably be terrified of losing money next summer when his price comes down.
I don't disagree with that. I think the club us at a stick or twist moment with regards to kicking on and it feels like we've just decided to ride it out.The frustration is that it would/will spiral,
Sell off Clarke now, and we don’t get promoted. Where does that leave us with regard to holding on to the likes of Neil, Bellingham, Ballard, Rigg, Colton, Patterson, Hume in a years time? Do we expect these lads to hang around indefinitely in the hole that one day - at an indeterminate point however many years in the future - the club might prioritise promotion? Good luck with that.
Nobody has ever seen a pile of bank notes score a goal.
Roberts isn't injured though, so why are you creating negative hypotheticals to add emphasis to how big a blow losing Clarke would be?Take Clarke out for Saturday, and say Roberts was injured.
What's the options that would cause Burnley problems at the weekend?
Take Clarke out for Saturday, and say Roberts was injured.
What's the options that would cause Burnley problems at the weekend?
You been building your nuclear shelter in the back garden in case one goes off in the near future. Give it a rest mate.Take Clarke out for Saturday, and say Roberts was injured.
What's the options that would cause Burnley problems at the weekend?
Aye, our only real data point is Ross and we had Southamptons pants downWe have business people in charge of our football club now not pissy panted little boys. If we got £8m + add ons for an injured player with 1 year left on his contract why do you think they'd be "terrified" of having to make a good deal for one of the best players in the league?