IPL Verus Test Cricket

[chelt_mackem]

The problem is that the size of the market for cricket in India is massive compared to the rest of the world so it doesn't matter what the figures outside of India are (and it's certainly broadcast in every test playing country although I've no idea of viewing figures)

That's true, but if it's being broadcast but not watched in the other test playing nations, then the only country that will be affected from a test point of view will be India. Regardless of the level of demand for it there, if that demand isn't there in other countries, the IPL won't pose a genuine threat to test cricket.

There's a very good reason why Sky don't want to broadcast it despite wanting to show everything else.

 

[mikemanc]

That's true, but if it's being broadcast but not watched in the other test playing nations, then the only country that will be affected from a test point of view will be India. Regardless of the level of demand for it there, if that demand isn't there in other countries, the IPL won't pose a genuine threat to test cricket.

There's a very good reason why Sky don't want to broadcast it despite wanting to show everything else.

How can you say it wouldn't affect other test nations when the likes of Gayle, Pollard, Narine and Bravo were playing in the IPL while the Windies were getting battered in tests? Or Malinga retiring from tests to play in ODI's?

 

[chelt_mackem]

How can you say it wouldn't affect other test nations when the likes of Gayle, Pollard, Narine and Bravo were playing in the IPL while the Windies were getting battered in tests? Or Malinga retiring from tests to play in ODI's?

Sorry, what I meant to say was that it's not affecting the demand from fans in other test nations to have test cricket. And while the demand is still there, the IPL can say what it likes, but test cricket will be here to stay.

 

[Twisted]

Sorry, what I meant to say was that it's not affecting the demand from fans in other test nations to have test cricket. And while the demand is still there, the IPL can say what it likes, but test cricket will be here to stay.

Logon or register to see this image

 

[Marko]

A piece from Murali.

England's T20 'old fashioned' says Murali

Muttiah Muralitharan has become a globetrotting T20 specialist in his dotage, such as his spell at Wellington, and he has seen enough to conclude that England's set-up is old fashioned © Getty Images
Enlarge
Related Links
Players/Officials: Muttiah Muralitharan
Series/Tournaments: Friends Life t20 | England Domestic Season
Teams: Gloucestershire | Somerset
Muttiah Muralitharan, Sri Lanka's record-breaking spin bowler, has dismissed England's Twenty20 format as "old fashioned" and called for it to adopt the franchise format favoured by the IPL.

Muralitharan is about to begin his second season with Gloucestershire in Friends Life t20 and as the competition begins he has risked a storm by suggesting that they should merge with their fiercest rivals Somerset.

"That would be good as they are close counties and they would benefit financially," he said. The ECB insists that the 18-county system is sacrosanct yet England players play little, if any, domestic T20 cricket because of an international programme that dominates the entire summer. England's T20 tournament was an innovative product when it launched in 2003, but Muralitharan argued that it has now fallen behind rival tournaments around the world.

"They introduced it worldwide but now England is old-fashioned," he told BBC Points West. "They need to change and become franchised teams and each county would benefit financially. If it happens like that it would be huge in England. I think the market is there, and the TV rights will come."

Muralitharan, 40, has a wealth of experience on his side. As well as Sri Lanka his clubs include Chennai Super Kings, Royal Challengers Bangalore, Kochi Tuskers, Chittagong Kings, Kandurata, Lancashire and Wellington.

Since its inception in 2003, the game has been adapted worldwide, taking on several different guises. But the FLt20 will struggle to make impact this summer, not just competing against England's unrelenting schedule but the European football championships and London's hosting of the Olympics.

Debate is still going on about the structure of England's T20 tournament in 2013, but this season the 18 counties, restricted to a maximum of two overseas players, play 10 matches in three groups of six before reaching the quarterfinal stages.

Muralitharan even suggested that England's T20 competition was lagging behind Bangladesh, a competition that has been characterised by a stand off between FICA, the international players' association, and the BCB over owed player payments.

"Bangladesh launched it big and their crowds have been 30-40,000 for every match," he said. "Australia has merged into eight franchises so I think England should also do that and it could equal IPL."

Muralitharan starts his second spell with Gloucestershire on Thursday against local rivals Somerset, and believes merging the two counties to become a T20 franchise would be a good move.

"At the end of the day the public will see good cricket and enjoy it," he said. "Money will be spinning from the competition and they can sustain the other forms of the game within county cricket. It would be one of the best things to happen if they do that. It will make sure the competition is more successful than what it is now."

If franchises were introduced, personally I'd lose all interest, and wouldn't even entertain the idea of going to Headingley to support 'my team'

 

[Twisted]

that is the biggest load of f***ing shite i think ive ever read

Muralitharan, 40, ... his clubs include Chennai Super Kings, Royal Challengers Bangalore, Kochi Tuskers, Chittagong Kings, Kandurata, Lancashire and Wellington

says it all, the IPL has been around a couple of years and already he's played for half the sides in it. utterly f***ing pointless

 

[essex boy]

That's true, but if it's being broadcast but not watched in the other test playing nations, then the only country that will be affected from a test point of view will be India. Regardless of the level of demand for it there, if that demand isn't there in other countries, the IPL won't pose a genuine threat to test cricket.

There's a very good reason why Sky don't want to broadcast it despite wanting to show everything else.

Surely they dont show it for two main reasons:

a) they would have to pay a kings ransom to the IPL organisers
b) it would clash with our May test series which they have rights to broadcast

 

[chelt_mackem]

Surely they dont show it for two main reasons:

a) they would have to pay a kings ransom to the IPL organisers
b) it would clash with our May test series which they have rights to broadcast

ITV don't exactly strike me as having money to burn, especially as they show it one of their obscure channels. Agree about it clashing with the May tests though, I doubt they would want one of their channels showing the IPL and therefore being completely ignored because the tests are on.