Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I have to agree with him. Just as well you have Anderson who can swing the ball first up and reverse swing it later on making him a very good test match bowler. Gough's comments if anything are more of a bad reflection on our other bowlers who dont swing the ball at all such as Broad.
Broad is Englands best bowler by a distance
Broad is Englands best bowler by a distance
But he's not a swing bowler, so should still take wickets when it's not swinging. So why doesnt he?
Despite his thoroughly inept performance today he is the best of a bad ODI bunch of quicks. He was a disgrace today and he was the one bowler with bounce in his armoury that could have made it really uncomfortable for them.
Hes miles short of Anderson as a test match bowler as his record proves.[/QUOTE]
oh please. Yet another who watches 12 months of the ball zipping all over the shop on tailored made Jimmy wickets and gets carried away.
unfit today, had a dicky belly
the vast majority of wickets we have played on over the last 12 months have been conduvice to swing bowlers. Whilst being able to swing it, he has a lot more strings to his bow
Despite his thoroughly inept performance today he is the best of a bad ODI bunch of quicks. He was a disgrace today and he was the one bowler with bounce in his armoury that could have made it really uncomfortable for them.
Hes miles short of Anderson as a test match bowler as his record proves.[/QUOTE]
oh please. Yet another who watches 12 months of the ball zipping all over the shop on tailored made Jimmy wickets and gets carried away.
They have both played shitloads of test now all over the world. Anderson currently is a dsitance ahead of Broad as a test match bowler - his record proves it. Even Broad and his dad would agree.
They have both played shitloads of test now all over the world. Anderson currently is a dsitance ahead of Broad as a test match bowler - his record proves it. Even Broad and his dad would agree.
Jimmy is a much better bowler on damp green tops
unfit today, had a dicky belly
the vast majority of wickets we have played on over the last 12 months have been conduvice to swing bowlers. Whilst being able to swing it, he has a lot more strings to his bow
A lot of test match conditions are so its important to have a top class exponent of those conditions. We arent hjust talking about the WI in May we are talking about reverse swing at Adelaide and opening spells at Melbourne and Sydney.
Jimmy is a much better bowler on damp green tops
Yes he is - hes also a better bowler reversing the old ball in dry conditions and opening the bowling in all conditions.
Yes he is - hes also a better bowler reversing the old ball in dry conditions and opening the bowling in all conditions.
Broad is more flexible and has more variety in his game
Australia have had monsoons all summer, which is why you saw houses floating in Brisbane
Broad is more flexible and has more variety in his game
Ideal for ODI - I wish we had seem a bit more of that variety, fleibility and thinking on his feet today though :-(
Bowlers have different qualities but when push comes to shove when one bowler has a significantly better record than the other, when both have played a lot of cricket, then hes a better bowler.