ICC change super over law

Status
Not open for further replies.

TheRey

Winger

From now on, a tied super over will be repeated until there's an outright winner.

Wrong move, IMO
 


England win something on a law that had been universally agreed by the ICC member countries, twats from the subcontinent whinge and cry, rule is changed :rolleyes:

If it had been anyone else it would not have been changed (unless it was anyone against India) as there would have been no outcry from the ABE brigade
 
Last edited:
England win something on a law that had been universally agreed by the ICC member countries, twats from the subcontinent whinge and cry, rule is changed :rolleyes:

If it had been anyone else it would not have been changed (unless it was anyone against India) as there would have been no outcry from the ABE brigade

Buzzing that we won but I agree with the rule change - old one was crap
 
Cricket has always had rules like these.. E. G. net run rate. We missed out on the Royal London knock-out stage because the tie-breaker was position in the county championship (?!?!).

It feels like a dogwhistle attempt to piss on England's parade from an ICC firmly wedged up India's arse.
 
Last edited:
Cricket has always had rules like these.. E. G. net run rate. We missed out on the Royal London knock-out stage because the tie-breaker was position in the county championship (?!?!).

It feels like a dogwhistle attempt to piss on England's parade from an ICC firmly wedged up India's arse.

It’s not pissing on England’s parade at all, not even in the slighest.

The World Cup was won in July it’s now October and it’s changing the rule for the future!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top