ICC change super over law



England win something on a law that had been universally agreed by the ICC member countries, twats from the subcontinent whinge and cry, rule is changed :rolleyes:

If it had been anyone else it would not have been changed (unless it was anyone against India) as there would have been no outcry from the ABE brigade
 
Last edited:
Silly Point said:
England win something on a law that had been universally agreed by the ICC member countries, twats from the subcontinent whinge and cry, rule is changed :rolleyes:

If it had been anyone else it would not have been changed (unless it was anyone against India) as there would have been no outcry from the ABE brigade
Click to expand...

Buzzing that we won but I agree with the rule change - old one was crap
 
Cricket has always had rules like these.. E. G. net run rate. We missed out on the Royal London knock-out stage because the tie-breaker was position in the county championship (?!?!).

It feels like a dogwhistle attempt to piss on England's parade from an ICC firmly wedged up India's arse.
 
Last edited:
smoker said:
Cricket has always had rules like these.. E. G. net run rate. We missed out on the Royal London knock-out stage because the tie-breaker was position in the county championship (?!?!).

It feels like a dogwhistle attempt to piss on England's parade from an ICC firmly wedged up India's arse.
Click to expand...

It’s not pissing on England’s parade at all, not even in the slighest.

The World Cup was won in July it’s now October and it’s changing the rule for the future!
 

Back
Top