Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
No idea - that’s why I’m asking are we even capable of evolutionary change in the face of something like global warming which will affect our environment
My old history teacher used to reckon we'll grow another finger eventually, next to the little one - but he was a smoggy- and called mr hand.
The number of times I've give the truthful answer to a question that didn't require one. I can't help it, if you ask me what the meal was like and I thought it was crap I'll tell you (that answer went down well with my wife on our first date when she cooked me a meal). NT's are weird with their white lies for answers, just tell the truth man woman man.We're trying so hard man...just need people to stop and listen. OK, so we don't have normal empathy...we have to learn it, and if every nuerotypical soul had to learn it too, maybe they wouldb't be so clumsy with it. Love is a gift...don't gift wrap it in shite.
ps. Sorry I'm a bit tough love
Natural selection is natural selection. Evolution is changes to the body caused by a natural requirement.I think we must be crossing wires, we all contain random mutations, I was pointing out that a mutation alone does not proliferate, it requires us to select it, natural selection.
Unlikely as that's just the size of heed at birth.
Charver lads are often without body hair.
A of the world haven't evolved this yet, Asians etc.A ‘recent’ evolutionary change is that we’ve only evolved to being able to drink cows milk in the last 5,000 years which humans couldn’t for the first 300,000 years.
Something like a quater of British babies are aborted. Shocking stuff really.In January and February? Staggering numbers of so.
Antibiotic resistance took less than a centuryFor humans maybe
But we don’t see evolution that I’m aware of in animals that have shorter lifespans
Covid evolved last week (if you can class that as life)Antibiotic resistance took less than a century
So it’s possible that evolution has stopped then if we put it down to diets
Peppered moths - a GCSE classic.For humans maybe
But we don’t see evolution that I’m aware of in animals that have shorter lifespans
Natural selection is natural selection. Evolution is changes to the body caused by a natural requirement.
Due to the introduction of fire we could cook food. That resulted in less energy (and oxygenated blood) needed to digest the food, so blood could be diverted from the digestive tract to the brain, allowing humans to have bigger brains - evolution
People marrying taller people and having babies that grow taller - natural selection.
They aren’t greedier or lazier they’ve been put in an environment that doesn’t allow them freedom and feeds them rich banquets everyday. The kids are fundamentally no different to us they just have knacker parents and live in a world where people are frightened to let them get on with it.That's not evolution though. If bairns went on the same diet and exercised as much there'd be no difference. They're not born with fatter genes. Theyre just greedier and lazier.
That’s why I think Darwin is an favourite genius. It is so simple a concept for something that evaded humanity for a long time.Evolution through natural selection happens as a result of certain members of the population managing to survive long enough to breed and raise their offspring to the point of self-sufficiency while other members of the population fail to do so and therefore fail to pass on their own genes to the next generation.
If the planet heated up to the point that 99% of humans died of and the only ones left were those that had some sort of genetic resistance to the temperature, then "natural selection" would have done its job and the "new" version of humans in future generations from then on would all have that gene that made them more resistant to temperature (except for any born with a mutation "back" to the old standard.
Species don't "learn to adapt" in the way you're suggesting. Individuals who can't cope with the conditions of their habitat die. Those that survive breed. "Cant cope" genes fail to be passed on to the next generation. "Manage to cope" genes get passed on to the next generation.
That's slightly oversimplified, but it's essentially the general gist.
Evolution isn't a sudden thing its a gradual process so no-one would notice the difference environmental impacts have.I suppose the obvious answer is no as world records for running get broken very often - but the people who do that are the exception not the norm.
If babies suddenly started being born with an extra finger we’d likely try and treat them to make them ‘normal’.
But I’m struggling to think how we naturally evolve. Any ideas?
I remember reading years ago that we had reached close to the peak of human endurance when it comes to breaking records. They said that the future would be more accurate timing. As in time a race down to millionths of a second maybe.Training methods and such have also evolved hence records being broken
OK better question then how do you see us evolving?No. Evolution happens over a much longer period of time then we will see in our lifetime.
Believe he invented the 6 day working week. Only Sundays off.Good job I believe in God
Also boozeA ‘recent’ evolutionary change is that we’ve only evolved to being able to drink cows milk in the last 5,000 years which humans couldn’t for the first 300,000 years.