• The forum upgrades are now largely complete.
    Please read this thread for more details.
    New user registrations are currently disabled.

Has - beens, Ben Stokes


Stokes replied: "I can't see there being someone else who could take this team from where we are now to even bigger heights."

Really, Ben? What are these amazing heights we are hitting right now?

Given that the only alternative currently appears to be Brooks there's some validity in what Stokes claims. The real problem is Key
 
Stokes replied: "I can't see there being someone else who could take this team from where we are now to even bigger heights."

Really, Ben? What are these amazing heights we are hitting right now?

I know i've been disagreed with but if McCullum has been truly humbled by their brash approach and is willing to take the criticism on board i'm not against him staying on, Stokes should stay either way for me.
 
Stokes replied: "I can't see there being someone else who could take this team from where we are now to even bigger heights."

Really, Ben? What are these amazing heights we are hitting right now?


Was just about to say, amazing heights including being 7th in the current WTC and not winning a 5 test series. They really are wrapped up in their own little conceited bubble at times. Probably worried that if they move on McCullum, they might have to practise and work on technique.
 
Stokes replied: "I can't see there being someone else who could take this team from where we are now to even bigger heights."

Really, Ben? What are these amazing heights we are hitting right now?

I thought if there was one thing that this board pretty much unanimously agreed with Stokes on it was at the WTC didn’t matter. Is it important now then? I struggle to keep up sometimes.
 
Back
Top