• The forums will be unavailable for a few hours on Saturday 6th June, when they do return they will initially be in a degraded state with some features missing, but normal posting/reading will be possible. The main website will not be affected by these updates.
    New user registrations are currently disabled.
    Some other features of the forum are also currently disabled.

Harold Larwood

Status
Not open for further replies.
Reading a cracking autobiography at the moment regarding Larwood.

Now how quick the bloke bowled gets mentioned all the time with speeds of 95pmph mentioned. Obviously back then there was no real accurate way of confirming this but i'd have thought modern fast bowlers of today would be far quicker with advances in sporting science etc..?

Thoughts?
 

Reading a cracking autobiography at the moment regarding Larwood.

Now how quick the bloke bowled gets mentioned all the time with speeds of 95pmph mentioned. Obviously back then there was no real accurate way of confirming this but i'd have thought modern fast bowlers of today would be far quicker with advances in sporting science etc..?

Thoughts?

Really eh;)
 
Reading a cracking autobiography at the moment regarding Larwood.

Now how quick the bloke bowled gets mentioned all the time with speeds of 95pmph mentioned. Obviously back then there was no real accurate way of confirming this but i'd have thought modern fast bowlers of today would be far quicker with advances in sporting science etc..?

Thoughts?
They had this strange shaped box thing they called a "cinematograph" you know ...
 
Reading a cracking autobiography at the moment regarding Larwood.

Now how quick the bloke bowled gets mentioned all the time with speeds of 95pmph mentioned. Obviously back then there was no real accurate way of confirming this but i'd have thought modern fast bowlers of today would be far quicker with advances in sporting science etc..?

Thoughts?
Well the modern day bowlers are not quicker than the West Indian bowlers of 20 or 30 years ago.
 
Reading a cracking autobiography at the moment regarding Larwood.

Now how quick the bloke bowled gets mentioned all the time with speeds of 95pmph mentioned. Obviously back then there was no real accurate way of confirming this but i'd have thought modern fast bowlers of today would be far quicker with advances in sporting science etc..?

Thoughts?

Is that the book by Douglas Hamilton? it's a cracking book, and gives a wonderful insight into cricket in that era
 
Reading a cracking autobiography at the moment regarding Larwood.

Now how quick the bloke bowled gets mentioned all the time with speeds of 95pmph mentioned. Obviously back then there was no real accurate way of confirming this but i'd have thought modern fast bowlers of today would be far quicker with advances in sporting science etc..?

Thoughts?

Started reading the book in the last week and im loving it. No helmets and not much padding either. Proving how fast he bowled is irrelevent imo as he out played every quality batsmen he bowled too at what is a batsmans game. Looking forward to finishing the book over the summer, one of the best cricket books ive read imo.
 
pattisoni said:
Started reading the book in the last week and im loving it. No helmets and not much padding either. Proving how fast he bowled is irrelevent imo as he out played every quality batsmen he bowled too at what is a batsmans game. Looking forward to finishing the book over the summer, one of the best cricket books ive read imo.

Agree with all that, the writing is great too. I will bring 'A Last English Summer' down to Essex for you Mick.
 
Started reading the book in the last week and im loving it. No helmets and not much padding either. Proving how fast he bowled is irrelevent imo as he out played every quality batsmen he bowled too at what is a batsmans game. Looking forward to finishing the book over the summer, one of the best cricket books ive read imo.



fuck me mick......... how bigs the book:eek:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top