I said elsewhere about the likes of crane and Bess plus others who get benched and replaced by the mercenaryWankers.
No I absolutely agree, mate. What says it all is that Surrey have been dead against this from the start and vocal about it, but the ECB begged and made threats to ensure there's an Oval team - which for me absolutey signifies they have a long term plan, and this is the start of the slope towards it.I said elsewhere about the likes of crane and Bess plus others who get benched and replaced by the mercenary
The FTECB is sitting by developing plans for franchise cricket. This is not a jibe but Surrey will be in there but the likes of Durham, Gloucester, Worcester, somerset, Essex, derby will be dispensed with or relegated to minor county status
It’s absolutely clear to me that’s what they want.
What's the difference between signing him and Bancroft?Want to sign Nathan Lyon next summer as their overseas. They don't give a fuck about English cricket. Even their own fans against it.
We don't have a bunch of young England qualified players banging down the door whereas Hampshire have two spinners who've played for England so you'd assume one of them won't play. I get it's a fine balance between a competitive standard, overseas players passing on experience and young players getting time
England are desperately trying to produce spinners. Hampshire have 2 lads tried by England at test level. One of which hardly gets a ball as is.
We don't have any talented spinners. Trevaskis can barely spin the ball.Exactly we all know if Durham signed Lyon, everybody’s view would be diffrent!
Never claimed to be.So in other words you not objective on the subject