• The first stage of the forum upgrades has now been completed but they remain in a degraded state and are still being worked on. Normal posting/reading should now be possible.
    Please read this thread for more details.
    New user registrations are currently disabled.

'Gini' sold by the scum?

Status
Not open for further replies.

Reiver said:
Well please point that out and I'll happily apologise ......... I believe you were rude to me first on #119

And, yes ....... you claimed Sunderland didn't relegate Newcastle in the Everton game.
Click to expand...

Ok, this is a reply to my post in which I rebuke your claim that Gini was only called "Gini" after the Norwich game. In this reply you've asked me to point this out and that you'd apologise (Sima has since posted links so I won't bother), then you claim I was rude to you first. Those 2 statements are unrelated, yet appear linked by the ellipses. You then bring a 3rd subject into the post which is similarly unrelated.

In post #119 I wasn't being rude, I even said in the post "That's not a criticism", it was a question. I asked it because I would modify my tone/conversation with you accordingly. I've mates with ADHD and they've explained it thus, their brains have a slightly larger gap between neurons than normal, so where we make 1 synaptic connection, they'll make 5, and those 5 will each make 5 and so on. I wouldn't expect them to follow a line of discussion as easily when they've 100 different things firing around their brain at once. As such you have to be more patient, and more clear.
 
The Fish said:
Ok, this is a reply to my post in which I rebuke your claim that Gini was only called "Gini" after the Norwich game. In this reply you've asked me to point this out and that you'd apologise (Sima has since posted links so I won't bother), then you claim I was rude to you first. Those 2 statements are unrelated, yet appear linked by the ellipses. You then bring a 3rd subject into the post which is similarly unrelated.

In post #119 I wasn't being rude, I even said in the post "That's not a criticism", it was a question. I asked it because I would modify my tone/conversation with you accordingly. I've mates with ADHD and they've explained it thus, their brains have a slightly larger gap between neurons than normal, so where we make 1 synaptic connection, they'll make 5, and those 5 will each make 5 and so on. I wouldn't expect them to follow a line of discussion as easily when they've 100 different things firing around their brain at once. As such you have to be more patient, and more clear.
Click to expand...

So, in post 190, you totally ignored everything else and were specifically referring only to the 'Gini' point :rolleyes:

Dear me .......

"Call it a question, a point or an opinion.

The fact is that you go into psycho-babble, and questioning people's mental capacity, whenever you don't have an answer.

I haven't insulted or denigrated Newcastle, I simply responded to your assertions about Sunderland being seen as a 'relegation' club.

My points were entirely valid, logical and reasonable but, because of your bias, you take offence.

When you couldn't answer the point about Townsend you started with the inevitable stupidity and digressions."
 
Reiver said:
So, in post 190, you totally ignored everything else and were specifically referring only to the 'Gini' point :rolleyes:

Dear me .......

"Call it a question, a point or an opinion.

The fact is that you go into psycho-babble, and questioning people's mental capacity, whenever you don't have an answer.

I haven't insulted or denigrated Newcastle, I simply responded to your assertions about Sunderland being seen as a 'relegation' club.

My points were entirely valid, logical and reasonable but, because of your bias, you take offence.

When you couldn't answer the point about Townsend you started with the inevitable stupidity and digressions."
Click to expand...
Reiver, you should just stop communicating with the bore. He's only on here to try and wind people up, although he's not very good at it. He'd argue that black is white rather than back down. These pseudo-intellectuals absolutely ruin decent debate on forums like this.
 
Reiver said:
So, in post 190, you totally ignored everything else and were specifically referring only to the 'Gini' point :rolleyes:
Click to expand...

That's a lie Revier, I didn't ignore it, I specifically addressed it by calling it untrue. Trouble is, it becomes a "yes it is", "no it isn't" borefest so I'd rather leave you be, thanks very much.
 
The Fish said:
That's a lie Revier, I didn't ignore it, I specifically addressed it by calling it untrue. Trouble is, it becomes a "yes it is", "no it isn't" borefest so I'd rather leave you be, thanks very much.
Click to expand...
You still on here ya f***ing obsessed sad cu.nt, here's an idea why don't you log off and get a life man ya pathetic individual
 
The Fish said:
That's a lie Revier, I didn't ignore it, I specifically addressed it by calling it untrue. Trouble is, it becomes a "yes it is", "no it isn't" borefest so I'd rather leave you be, thanks very much.
Click to expand...
Ffs what a tedious cernt you are. Do us a favour and leave us all be. If you are so obsessed with us that you feel you must keep posting on here then at least make a decent contribution. Most of us realise Sima has issues so he at least has an excuse, you are just on here to ruin threads, just piss off.
Hadn't read some of the above posts, great minds think alike.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top