• The first stage of the forum upgrades has now been completed but they remain in a degraded state and are still being worked on. Normal posting/reading should now be possible.
    Please read this thread for more details.
    New user registrations are currently disabled.

Geertruida


Wonder what Liverpool have offered RB?

Given they were willing to accept €20m from us and if Liverpool have offered, say, 30m then RB pay us 5m to break the loan and everybody wins
We're effectively losing a £30m player that would only cost us £17m. We paid a loan fee, so after everything that £5m is only £2.5m.

The only way this really benefits us is if we sign him for the £17m and clock all the profit ourselves.
 
Not the end of the world if he goes. It's crazy to think that, when everyone is fit, he doesn't get in our side but would be a starter at RB for Liverpool due to their injuries. Obligation to buy or not, hes not going to hang around here at his age if he's not getting a game. Shame like.
 
Well this leaves us short doesn’t it? Surely we must find a replacement before agreeing that isn’t a young player on loan?
 
It'll end up being a return of the loan fee plus compensation if it goes through. It appears we've know of this for a while judging by his lack of game time recently and news may have broken because we are close to bringing someone in (hopefully).

Disappointing as his versatility is good for us but the Lad is going to choose Liverpool over us unfortunately.
 
He was perfect to fill in last week and he didnt even get on the pitch. Cant say I blame him if he leaves
Isn’t it more likely that’s the reason he wasn’t being played rather than the reason that he would want to leave? I don’t know. Could his parent club insist he not be risked?
 
Any chance we can use that 'good relationship' we were told we had with Chelsea after Guiu went back, to bring in a replacement?

Or are we just bending for the big sides?

Xhaka out for weeks and we just let the most natural replacement we have waltz to Liverpool
 
Back
Top