• The first stage of the forum upgrades has now been completed but they remain in a degraded state and are still being worked on.
    Please read this thread for more details.
    New user registrations are currently disabled.

Flat Earthers

Status
Not open for further replies.

Can you prove any of them?

Of course I don't. I don't believe it exists so how could I know what it is.
The problem is you believe it does exist and you do not know what it is.

Nope. I don't have factual evidence. I have my thoughts/theories.

Do you have any factual evidence for your global mindset?

Do you have any evidence thst can be tested for anything you've said on this thread?

I'd like to learn what reality is like and not this narrative all the liars have been telling us for thousands of years.
 
Why answer in so many bullets? Are you just on wind up now?
Are you asking me or telling me?
Read it again and then go to Thornes and buy a bloody physics book

What will the book tell me?
"The mass of Helium is effectively negative in the equation.
What about the mass of the balloon?

So helium goes up at the speed calculated.
We're not arguing UP.

The air filled balloon query relates to terminal velocity and is a relationship between drag coefficient and other calculations."
Everything relates to drag. It relates to resistance, which means there is no specific fall rate for all mass. It depends on the mass and the displacement of the atmosphere it is in,w hetehr it's dense or less dense.
So everyone in the plane industry is now in on the fiction as well?
Nope.
So if you scattered people randomly around the earth and they all faced north, they would all be looking towards the same point in the middle and essentially facing each other (though not able to see each other due to distance)?

If that is so, then logically if each person turned 180 degrees they would all be facing south and all have their backs to each other?
Yep, basically.
 
Last edited:
Can you prove any of them?

Of course I don't. I don't believe it exists so how could I know what it is.
The problem is you believe it does exist and you do not know what it is.

Nope. I don't have factual evidence. I have my thoughts/theories.

Do you have any factual evidence for your global mindset?
Evidence from probably 100’s of scientists who have researched this over many years to come to the conclusion we have now.
You must be logged on to see media items

Now this fella is supposedly rather clever and spent his life in the field of science so feel free to debunk this and let me know your theories and what you’ve done to come to your conclusion🙏
 
Evidence from probably 100’s of scientists who have researched this over many years to come to the conclusion we have now.
You must be logged on to see media items

Now this fella is supposedly rather clever and spent his life in the field of science so feel free to debunk this and let me know your theories and what you’ve done to come to your conclusion🙏
He's just in it to further is career
 
Are you asking me or telling me?


What will the book tell me?

What about the mass of the balloon?


We're not arguing UP.


Everything relates to drag. It relates to resistance, which means there is no specific fall rate for all mass. It depends on the mass and the displacement of the atmosphere it is in,w hetehr it's dense or less dense.

Nope.

Yep, basically.

Why do you believe what you believe with no irrefutable fact based evidence but you reject hundreds of years of science?
 
Do you have any evidence thst can be tested for anything you've said on this thread?
Water level.


I'd like to learn what reality is like and not this narrative all the liars have been telling us for thousands of years.
You will need to start questioning the narratives and delving into it yourself. You'll never do it if you are not dedicated to finding it out without the distraction of peer pressure and ridicule.
It's far easier for people to just follow the accepted norm.
Evidence from probably 100’s of scientists who have researched this over many years to come to the conclusion we have now.
You must be logged on to see media items

Now this fella is supposedly rather clever and spent his life in the field of science so feel free to debunk this and let me know your theories and what you’ve done to come to your conclusion🙏
He's a journalist who now spouts off about science.
They're good entertainers for the masses.
 
Last edited:
Water level.



You will need to start questioning the narratives and delving into it yourself. You'll never do it if you are not dedicated to finding it out without the distraction of peer pressure and ridicule.
It's far easier for people to just follow the accepted norm.
Yeah it must be difficult everyone thinking you are mad
 
Water level.



You will need to start questioning the narratives and delving into it yourself. You'll never do it if you are not dedicated to finding it out without the distraction of peer pressure and ridicule.
It's far easier for people to just follow the accepted norm.

He's a journalist who now spouts off about science.
They're good entertainers for the masses.
But he’s explaining it using evidence from scientific data and research going back 1000’s of years.

what evidence do you have to debunk all this though?
Surely you have something, you cannot act like a 6 year old and say it’s not true for the hell of it🤷‍♂️
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top