• The first stage of the forum upgrades has now been completed but they remain in a degraded state and are still being worked on.
    Please read this thread for more details.
    New user registrations are currently disabled.

England v Ireland, One Off Test

Status
Not open for further replies.

Just saying...

Ballance: 4 Test centuries in 23 matches

Westley, Malan, Stoneman, Vince, Dawson, Hameed, Denly, Burns, Ansari, Patel, Duckett, Pope, Hales, Borthwick, Roy: 1 Test century in 88 matches.
 
Temp0101 said:
Just saying...

Ballance: 4 Test centuries in 23 matches

Westley, Malan, Stoneman, Vince, Dawson, Hameed, Denly, Burns, Ansari, Patel, Duckett, Pope, Hales, Borthwick, Roy: 1 Test century in 88 matches.
Click to expand...

But he's not a test number 3, we need openers and a number 3. Roy should be given a chance but Burns is looking increasingly incapable and Denly is a ludicrous choice to bat at number 3 in test cricket. There's not many alternatives out there - I make a strong case for Sibley, but Denly is a lazy and poor selection.
 
The Breen Machine said:
But he's not a test number 3, we need openers and a number 3. Roy should be given a chance but Burns is looking increasingly incapable and Denly is a ludicrous choice to bat at number 3 in test cricket. There's not many alternatives out there - I make a strong case for Sibley, but Denly is a lazy and poor selection.
Click to expand...

The stats speak for themselves, I know you dislike the fella but he by-far outscores any other player in the redball game than any other player in the country by a large margin.
 
More deckchairs on the Titanic with our top order. Roy was never the answer, he's middle order batsman in first class cricket.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top