• The forums will be unavailable for a few hours on Saturday 6th June, when they do return they will initially be in a degraded state with some features missing, but normal posting/reading will be possible. The main website will not be affected by these updates.
    New user registrations are currently disabled.
    Some other features of the forum are also currently disabled.

Durham Women


Do these games have official list-A status? I know the previous version of the tournament didn't which seems to be why none of the players have any one day stats on Cricinfo etc unless they have played international cricket.
 
178/1 32.4 overs
Armitage 64*
Bates 93*

173 Partnership Armitage & Bates

Durham Women win by 9 wickets
.

You must be logged on to see media items
You must be logged on to see media items
 
Last edited:
I am for this right, before some bites my head off, but how is this sustainable? Like such low crowds and that.
To be fair you could ask the same about the men's team. There were about the same there as for the third day v Yorkshire. I don't know how many people coughed up for a ticket today though. I'm guessing the vast majority were members, 'guests' or on freebies/cheap tickets. I have no idea where the cash comes from to support this. If they had to self-support, I guess it would not be sustainable. Piggybacking on the men's team is the only realistic way of it being feasible. An entertaining day nonetheless.
Thoroughly enjoyed that game...now to thaw out.🥶
I was promised 13c and sun. It was cold and damp.
 
Last edited:
To be fair mens FC cricket outside the T20 is completely unsustainable too. Not a chance the membership and gate takings make even a dent in the player wage bill
But the men's FC game is the feeder for the England team which draws massive gate,tv and sponsorship income. At present, the women's game draws nothing like comparable revenue from those sources.
 
Back
Top