dom
Striker
Well I beg to differ but I’d love it if you prove me wrong.Different times now mate, in the past yes but now no chance.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Well I beg to differ but I’d love it if you prove me wrong.Different times now mate, in the past yes but now no chance.
Well I beg to differ but I’d love it if you prove me wrong.
Monumentally!Not trying to prove anything mate, just calling it as I see it, we will see.
His appearance tonight seems to have backfired mind.
Exactly how I would behave. but I was brought up on a council estate near peterlee, and didn’t attended a feeder school for EtonJudging from the clips on the news, that interview went well, didn't it ?
William and Harry have now been put back on breeding duty, to put more heirs between this idiot and the throne.
Too busy drinking, snorting and shagging, perhaps...
You are just about wrong about everything constantlyNope, when have I ever been wrong about anything on here. He'll be strung up, 20 years back no chance, but now he is a goner.
He seems to be able to remember the smallest details from nearly a decade ago, but not the big details from this year! Hmmm.
"When did you last speak with Ghislaine?"
"Summer"..."late spring"..."early spring"..."when did Epstein get arrested?" [July]..."yes, before July!"
...
"Where were you on 10 March 2001?"
"Pizza Express Woking".
LOL
No it was not beyond the realm of possibility but I was not surprised by his turn of phrase. Neither should the interviewer have been.Eh? Was it beyond the realms of possibility that he might describe it in stronger terms?? They're brought up to speak a certain way but he's entirely capable of describing the behaviour of an evil paedophile in terms that are stronger than those he'd use to describe someone using the wrong fork at dinner. I mean fuck me.
Amazing how some on here are dismissing this as a conspiracy when we literally had an avalanche of rich and powerful people exposed for historical child sex abuse in the past decade.
It's absolutely plausible and it's in the public interest to pursue it.
You are just about wrong about everything constantly
did a judge in the US not consider the evidence and threw the allegation out with some scathing remarksEvidence tends to be collected through a police investigation after an allegation has been made, so it's pretty bold to claim there is no evidence. There is a credible allegation, and circumstantial evidence that requires further investigation.
Like a Mag at a spelling contestLogon or register to see this image