• The forum upgrades are now largely complete.
    Please read this thread for more details.
    New user registrations are currently disabled.

Cricket World Cup 2019

Status
Not open for further replies.
The Rat said:
Best keep quiet after some of your cricket statements

They nearly average the same but Roy’s strikerate is 12 higher, that’s a lot

That’s ideal
Click to expand...
Cricket is your sport and you still talk absolute waffle :lol:

They dont aalmost average the same.either .Another lie made to back up your point
 
Last edited:

The Rat said:
Can’t be arsed with a wind up merchant, enjoy your evening.

Go try it with someone else thanks
Click to expand...
Never occurred to you that roys strike rate is higher because he doesnt have to hold englands inmings together knowing practically every batsman below him world class?

The aussies dont dont anywhere near the strength england have .Roy gets out the next world class batsman comes in, the aussies dont have that

Also he doesnt almost average the same, youve made that up .

In no world other than yours is roy anywhere near as good as warner .absolute tosh
 
SAFC 2012 said:
Never occurred to you that roys strike rate is higher because he doesnt have to hold englands inmings together knowing practically every batsman below him world class?

The aussies dont dont anywhere near the strength england have .Roy gets out the next world class batsman comes in, the aussies dont have that

Also he doesnt almost average the same, youve made that up .

In no world other than yours is roy anywhere near as good as warner .absolute tosh
Click to expand...

Warner has and is one of the first picks in the IPL auction and has been one of the first names on a team sheet, while Roy has been in and out of teams, although that is T20 it tells a story of Warner’s rating and statue worldwide as opposed to Roy.
 
Voice of fair play said:
Warner has and is one of the first picks in the IPL auction and has been one of the first names on a team sheet, while Roy has been in and out of teams, although that is T20 it tells a story of Warner’s rating and statue worldwide as opposed to Roy.
Click to expand...

T20 different game, not interested in that, look at Rashid Khan's record there.

Roy is averaging this year 77 at a strike rate of 120

I mean, what more can he do? Warner is world class, but for this england side I'd rather have Roy, not picking up personality marra

Didn't even think that was a controversial view personally, allowed to disagree mind.

SAFC 2012 said:
Never occurred to you that roys strike rate is higher because he doesnt have to hold englands inmings together knowing practically every batsman below him world class?

The aussies dont dont anywhere near the strength england have .Roy gets out the next world class batsman comes in, the aussies dont have that

Also he doesnt almost average the same, youve made that up .

In no world other than yours is roy anywhere near as good as warner .absolute tosh
Click to expand...

Er hows that work, just because you said it? :confused:

What a weird theory by the way, certainly a new one to me, blaming Warner's team mates

They do almost average the same, Roy 42 Warner 44 aint it? was that when they were showing it before the tournament anyway, and strike rate much more important these days, compared to a different of 2

You sound like Peter Moores mate

You're allowed a diff opinion but making out like mines ridiculous aint true, their recent records reflect that.
 
Last edited:
The Rat said:
T20 different game, not interested in that, look at Rashid Khan's record there.

Roy is averaging this year 77 at a strike rate of 120

I mean, what more can he do? Warner is world class, but for this england side I'd rather have Roy, not picking up personality marra

Didn't even think that was a controversial view personally, allowed to disagree mind.



Er hows that work, just because you said it? :confused:

What a weird theory by the way, certainly a new one to me, blaming Warner's team mates

They do almost average the same, Roy 42 Warner 44 aint it? was that when they were showing it before the tournament anyway, and strike rate much more important these days, compared to a different of 2

You sound like Peter Moores mate

You're allowed a diff opinion but making out like mines ridiculous aint true, their recent records reflect that.
Click to expand...

While 50 over cricket is a difffent game, Roy is a very attacking a batsman, the fact he has not been picked up in the IPL or played just a few games as opposed to Warner who has been one of the best players in the competition is certainly a indicator of how much Warner is rated way above Roy in India.

Don't get me wrong Roy is superb and in terrific form, where as Warner although scoring runs doesn't look as fluent as he can be.

However without a shadow of a doubt imo, worldwide especially outside England, I would say Warner is rated the better batsman
 
Voice of fair play said:
While 50 over cricket is a difffent game, Roy is a very attacking a batsman, the fact he has not been picked up in the IPL or played just a few games as opposed to Warner who has been one of the best players in the competition is certainly a indicator of how much Warner is rated way above Roy in India.

Don't get me wrong Roy is superb and in terrific form, where as Warner although scoring runs doesn't look as fluent as he can be.

However without a shadow of a doubt imo, worldwide especially outside England, I would say Warner is rated the better batsman
Click to expand...

I am not bothered about whose reputation is higher or who is a better T20 player, I'd rather have Roy at the moment, and his record over the last 2 years shows that, its outstanding. Higher average and scored at a much quicker rate.

I am not sure why you are banging on about IPL, they also paid £1m quid for Darcy Short and Chris Morris.

Warner is a fantastic player, thats not up for debate, one of the best in the world.

So is Dhoni, but I'd rather have Jos Buttler for example.

Just my view. We have some absolutely world stars that don't quite get the credit they deserve IMO.

Anyway don't be sensible! Was that buffoon earlier that some how found it hilarious!
 
Last edited:
The Rat said:
I am not bothered about whose reputation is higher or who is a better T20 player, I'd rather have Roy at the moment, and his record over the last 2 years shows that, its outstanding. Higher average and scored at a much quicker rate.

I am not sure why you are banging on about IPL, they also paid £1m quid for Darcy Short and Chris Morris.

Warner is a fantastic player, thats not up for debate, one of the best in the world.

So is Dhoni, but I'd rather have Jos Buttler for example.

Just my view.
Click to expand...

Not saying who you would rather have, saying imo, worldwide Warner will be rated higher.

Buttler is not a good comparison and a diffrent argument, Dhoni is in the twilight of his career and Buttler is simply superb.

Most teams worldwide would want Buttler currently in their team ahead of Dhoni, and similarly imo most teams worldwide would want Warner ahead of Roy imo.
 
Voice of fair play said:
Not saying who you would rather have, saying imo, worldwide Warner will be rated higher.

Buttler is not a good comparison and a diffrent argument, Dhoni is in the twilight of his career and Buttler is simply superb.

Most teams worldwide would want Buttler currently in their team ahead of Dhoni, and similarly imo most teams worldwide would want Warner ahead of Roy imo.
Click to expand...

You seem to have a lot of source inside all the world cup camps, well connected man!
 
Trouble I reckon. Pitch can slow up a tad here later on and really don't fancy us chasing in a world cup. Keep them below the record 329 and we may have a chance
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top