Covid vaccine as a requirement of employment contract?

Status
Not open for further replies.
SAFCOldie said:
So you have a heart attack but test positive or as seems the norm pick it up in hospital, how does this play out, after all you'd be classed as a covid admission. And you don't see the bigger picture, not in the slightest.
Click to expand...
Well if you tested negative when you went into hospital fair enough, but having had the vaccine you would be less of a drain on the system.

But you are choosing to ignore your responsibility to the wider society by trying to stretch the boundaries in the discussion as you do the lock down rules.

Just admit you want to do your own thing without any come back but for society to have your back.

Basically a selfish c++t
 
Last edited:


Nobby said:
Well if you tested negative when you went into hospital fair enough, but having had the vaccine you would be less of a drain on the system.

But you are choosing to ignore your responsibility to the wider society by trying to stretch the boundaries in the discussion as you do the lock down rules.

Just admit you want to do your own thing without any come back but for society to have your back.

Basically a selfish c++t
Click to expand...
This is not about a virus, if that penny hasn't dropped yet it never will.
 
Not arsed. Hopefully I'll get the vaccine before too long and be able to go where I want and do what I want
that's the dream anyways
 
SAFCOldie said:
So you have a heart attack but test positive or as seems the norm pick it up in hospital, how does this play out, after all you'd be classed as a covid admission. And you don't see the bigger picture, not in the slightest.
Click to expand...

It isn’t the norm at all. More than 80% of COVID admissions are new people into hospital.
 
Frijj said:
It isn’t the norm at all. More than 80% of COVID admissions are new people into hospital.
Click to expand...
Source, not doubting you, even 20 percent is high mind.
Nobby said:
Must admit not expecting him to reply directly just some random statement to try and deflect the discussion
Click to expand...
You don't see a problem, even if we go off Frijjs stats of 20 per cent being portrayed as covid admissions to the general public?
 
Last edited:
SAFCOldie said:
Source, not doubting you, even 20 percent is high mind.

You don't see a problem, even if we go off Frijjs stats of 20 per cent being portrayed as covid admissions to the general public?
Click to expand...
No please provide your evidence to support your point and clarify what you meant when you said it's not about the virus. Stop deflecting
 
SAFCOldie said:
Source, not doubting you, even 20 percent is high mind.

You don't see a problem, even if we go off Frijjs stats of 20 per cent being portrayed as covid admissions to the general public?
Click to expand...

They are effectively COVID admissions though. You do realise that the more people we admit with community-acquired infection, the greater the risk of hospital-acquired cases developing? Because there are more COVID cases in hospital meaning staff have more contact with COVID cases and more chances that someone unwittingly passes it on.

You must surely also realise that those who acquire it in hospital were already unwell with something else? And so those who acquire COVID in-hospital, are now fighting COVID and whatever they were admitted for?

Also, an unknown subset of those 20% will be people admitted who were already positive but for whatever reason tested negative, inconclusive or were not tested.

www.nuffieldtrust.org.uk

Chart of the week: The proportion of Covid-19 infections occurring within hospitals is growing as cases rise

Each week we present analysis of data in chart form to illustrate some key issues and invite discussion. This week, Sarah Scobie looks at the thorny problem of Covid-19 infections occurring when patients are already in hospital for other reasons. How significant a problem is this, and should we...
www.nuffieldtrust.org.uk www.nuffieldtrust.org.uk
 
Last edited:
Nobby said:
No please provide your evidence to support your point and clarify what you meant when you said it's not about the virus. Stop deflecting
Click to expand...
There's no point, let's just say and I'm presuming this, you think in March , when the vulnerable are vaccinated, we start to see a route to normalty, this is good that should be your barometer.
 
SAFCOldie said:
There's no point, let's just say and I'm presuming this, you think in March , when the vulnerable are vaccinated, we start to see a route to normalty, this is good that should be your barometer.
Click to expand...
As I thought you don't answer the question. What is this about if not the virus?

Sorry to be a bore just want you to say what this about and provide your evidence for review
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top