D
Deleted member 4700
Guest
And he is a representative of his constituents.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
He should have answered the door with a glass of whisky in his hand...not a lot they could have done..
As above. See this often. Car crash and run home. Claim they have just drank half a bottle of whisky. Still get lifted and lets test the science of itThis is what i was thinking, though not suggesting. You could say you had alcohol when you got home.
If the cops needed a warrant to enter your home to breathalyse you, it would be a foot race down your street until you dived through the door yelling "SAFE!"
... then flicking the Vs through the curtains for 5 minutes.
Well done on your appealBack on the road
Won his appeal due to Police error
Disappointed that he wasn't pissed sounds like attitude to me. They had no reason whatsoever to suspect he had been out driving. There wasn't even a hint that he had been. Breathalysing somebody who has his car stolen with no evidence he was involved for me isn't right. Victims being treat like criminals is how it comes over.Seemingly not. You dont have to be pissed to be over the limit. And sometimes people change from muddy boots before getting into bed
does it?Disappointed that he wasn't pissed sounds like attitude to me. They had no reason whatsoever to suspect he had been out driving. There wasn't even a hint that he had been. Breathalysing somebody who has his car stolen with no evidence he was involved for me isn't right. Victims being treat like criminals is how it comes over.
Any idea how that works? I would imagine someone say, six times over the limit would get hit more than someone just over the limit. If you know you are massively over would you be better off refusing? that's if you were capable of coherent thoughtThe same as blowing positive i think. Used to be less but they redressed the balance to stop people just refusing knowing it wouldnt be as bad
I think its the same punishment as if your were over the limit nowAny idea how that works? I would imagine someone say, six times over the limit would get hit more than someone just over the limit. If you know you are massively over would you be better off refusing? that's if you were capable of coherent thought
Sorry mate, I thought the amount over the limit was taken into consideration when sentencing. How does refusing to provide compare?I think its the same punishment as if your were over the limit now
not a clue.Sorry mate, I thought the amount over the limit was taken into consideration when sentencing. How does refusing to provide compare?
or meringue?
By the powers of GoogleMe neither mate
was just wondering
If the cops needed a warrant to enter your home to breathalyse you, it would be a foot race down your street until you dived through the door yelling "SAFE!"
... then flicking the Vs through the curtains for 5 minutes.
They'd maybe have taken you in for a chat but I doubt they would charge you as the CPS would still not have enough evidence to convict. Nobody can prove you were drink driving as you were not. As a credible witness your defence will be also sensibly considered. If there was an independent witness, speed camera photo or you'd left fingerprints (or semen) in the sheep in that field etc... then that would be a different matter.
They'd maybe have taken you in for a chat but I doubt they would charge you as the CPS would still not have enough evidence to convict. Nobody can prove you were drink driving as you were not. As a credible witness your defence will be also sensibly considered. If there was an independent witness, speed camera photo or you'd left fingerprints (or semen) on the gatepost etc... then that would be a different matter.
Well you never know.....why would there be semen on the gatepost?
The sheep didnt swallywhy would there be semen on the gatepost?