• The first stage of the forum upgrades has now been completed but they remain in a degraded state and are still being worked on. Normal posting/reading should now be possible.
    Please read this thread for more details.
    New user registrations are currently disabled.

CC :: Glamorgan v Durham


Pisspoor strategy that. We've just chewed up a load of overs and given them a batting point and a bit of a morale boost for the sake of 37 runs.

The only positive is learning there's something in the pitch for a finger spinner if the opposition bat like twats.
I have no idea what the thought process is here, we aren't losing this so why not have as many overs as possible at them.
 
What a start that should've been.

Clearly the lads are enjoying themselves so much they're prolongeingthr game.

Much appreciated in this weather.
 
Being on top helps but I can't remeber Durham being this loud in the field for a long time
Looks cracking weather down there, hope it's warmer than up here

It is. Was warmish through parts yesterday but still canny cold when a cloud got in front. Now it's just lovely
 
Last edited:
Cogs gets Northeast lbw for 5. Bit of a rat ball that seamed in sharply.

His bowling is looking much sharper than in his first stint.
.
That leg bye should have been out and all
 
Last edited:
Noticed tonight that Glamorgan have a podcast (it’s called ‘Oh Glammy Glammy’ and is available in the usual places) so I gave it a quick listen to see what they were saying about us.

Within three minutes the presenter asked the ‘guest’ to give his opinions on who would threaten Glamorgan’s bid for promotion - he said Durham and Leicestershire can be put in the ‘won’t trouble us’ bracket.

F*cking no nowt prick :lol:

I hope we absolutely smash these c*nts!

I wonder if this guest is eating his humble pie yet.
 
I wonder if this guest is eating his humble pie yet.
Has he been living in a cave for three years? I'd have said Durham and Notts are the best teams in div 2. Bookies have us third favourite after Notts and Middlesex.
.
This is too passive again, when we need to force a result. Give Trevaskis a try.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top