• The first stage of the forum upgrades has now been completed but they remain in a degraded state and are still being worked on. Normal posting/reading should now be possible.
    Please read this thread for more details.
    New user registrations are currently disabled.

CC : Durham v Hampshire


Ahh bollocks glossed over @brandon post

You must be logged on to see media items

There batting isn't as good as their bowling if you just look at it on paper. I think if we get the better of the conditions we've got a better side.

Glad to see our nemesis Barker isn't in the side either.
 
Last edited:
Stats back it up. Only 3 players averaging more than 29 with the bat last season. (Orr averaged 26 for Sussex as their new signing)

But a really good attack with Abbot, Abbas, Dawson, Fuller. Guess will be between Holland or Wheal for who sits out and who makes up the 5 man attack.

 
Last edited:
Stats back it up. Only 3 players averaging more than 29 with the bat last season. (Orr averaged 26 for Sussex as their new signing)

But a really good attack with Abbot, Abbas, Dawson, Fuller. Guess will be between Holland or Wheal for who sits out and who makes up the 5 man attack.


They had a lot of low scoring games last year, I think looking at it they tried to take draws out of the equation - a lot like us - but went about it in a totally different (wrong) way to what we did.
 
They had a lot of low scoring games last year, I think looking at it they tried to take draws out of the equation - a lot like us - but went about it in a totally different (wrong) way to what we did.
Guess why sport isn't played on paper.

Definitely not a batting attack to be frightened of.

Yorkshire for example will be lining up in game two with this. Which is definitely a ridiculous line-up for Division 2

Lyth
Bean
Masood
Root
Brook
Hill
Tattersall
Revis
 
Back
Top