• The forums will be unavailable for a few hours on Saturday 6th June, when they do return they will initially be in a degraded state with some features missing, but normal posting/reading will be possible. The main website will not be affected by these updates.
    New user registrations are currently disabled.
    Some other features of the forum are also currently disabled.

Big Wage Bill Increase

MonkeyLove

Striker
One thing that we are going to have to factor in even before we get into discussions about transfer spend, SCR etc… is we may well have to stump up significantly this summer just to stand still (Unless we go down the route of selling and reinvesting).

Just been looking at the Times ‘Value for money table’ and it has our wages down as 85 million for last year. Being it’s in the Times id imagine it’s fairly credible. By comparison most of our “mini league” are spending nearly twice that. Bournemouth, Fulham, Brighton, Forest etc… all at around 160 million a year. Even Brentford are over 130 million.

Clearly we don’t know who wants or will ask for a new contract but we all know what agents are like and just off the top of my head I’d imagine all of Roefs, Hume, Ballard, Sadiki, Talbi etc… are on considerably less then their performances are worth either because they were with us before promotion or because they were low profile when they came to us.

Brobbey, Le Fee, Mukiele etc… are supposedly our highest earners along with Xhaka at 70-80k a week but again their performances would easily make them 100k+ players at other clubs.

We’ve talked a bit about potentially selling to reinvest if we get huge money but the other dilemma the club may have is we are clearly getting huge value for money in achievement vs our wage bill (The exact analysis the times article were showing). That’s probably not going to last indefinitely with the current crop as by definition our young, emerging prospects will want bigger and better wages now they are established and that may domino to our current higher earners.

Probably 8-10 players I can think of that would potentially have a strong case. Something the club may have to build in to our squad plans this summer as it’s possible before even a penny is spent that just keeping this squad together for next year will take an investment in itself.
 

I would be absolutely mind blown if Bournemouth and Brightons wage bill was that amount

The only way they could be doing that is through their exceptional transfer business, using profits to pay a wage bill that would normally see them with a points deduction. It’s risky though.
 
I’d say 3 of those teams are the most average teams in the league, average wage in the league £70k so for a 25 man squad that’s around £90m. I can’t imagine Brighton, Fulham or Bournemouth having an average wage of £125k a week. If they do then the football bubble needs to burst as that’s obscene.
 
One thing that we are going to have to factor in even before we get into discussions about transfer spend, SCR etc… is we may well have to stump up significantly this summer just to stand still (Unless we go down the route of selling and reinvesting).

Just been looking at the Times ‘Value for money table’ and it has our wages down as 85 million for last year. Being it’s in the Times id imagine it’s fairly credible. By comparison most of our “mini league” are spending nearly twice that. Bournemouth, Fulham, Brighton, Forest etc… all at around 160 million a year. Even Brentford are over 130 million.

Clearly we don’t know who wants or will ask for a new contract but we all know what agents are like and just off the top of my head I’d imagine all of Roefs, Hume, Ballard, Sadiki, Talbi etc… are on considerably less then their performances are worth either because they were with us before promotion or because they were low profile when they came to us.

Brobbey, Le Fee, Mukiele etc… are supposedly our highest earners along with Xhaka at 70-80k a week but again their performances would easily make them 100k+ players at other clubs.

We’ve talked a bit about potentially selling to reinvest if we get huge money but the other dilemma the club may have is we are clearly getting huge value for money in achievement vs our wage bill (The exact analysis the times article were showing). That’s probably not going to last indefinitely with the current crop as by definition our young, emerging prospects will want bigger and better wages now they are established and that may domino to our current higher earners.

Probably 8-10 players I can think of that would potentially have a strong case. Something the club may have to build in to our squad plans this summer as it’s possible before even a penny is spent that just keeping this squad together for next year will take an investment in itself.
Stopped reading at Xhaka is on under a £100k a week
 
If Brighton have a wage bill of 160m for the squad and head coach then by the time they’ve added all the transfer fees etc to that to calculate their squad cost then surely they’ll be well over the 80%
 
People want to know absolutely everything these days
It never crossed my mind how much Dickie Ord or Nyron was getting paid!
 
If Brighton have a wage bill of 160m for the squad and head coach then by the time they’ve added all the transfer fees etc to that to calculate their squad cost then surely they’ll be well over the 80%
Theres a reason Brighton, Brentford, Bournemouth all voted against these new rules.
 
I’d say 3 of those teams are the most average teams in the league, average wage in the league £70k so for a 25 man squad that’s around £90m. I can’t imagine Brighton, Fulham or Bournemouth having an average wage of £125k a week. If they do then the football bubble needs to burst as that’s obscene.
No wonder Watson went there!
 
I saw the chart the op is talking about earlier, Leeds were on £135m, not surprised they are struggling with PSR (as admitted by the Leeds chairman/CEO). :oops:

Saudi's at £234m :lol:
 
One thing that we are going to have to factor in even before we get into discussions about transfer spend, SCR etc… is we may well have to stump up significantly this summer just to stand still (Unless we go down the route of selling and reinvesting).

Just been looking at the Times ‘Value for money table’ and it has our wages down as 85 million for last year. Being it’s in the Times id imagine it’s fairly credible. By comparison most of our “mini league” are spending nearly twice that. Bournemouth, Fulham, Brighton, Forest etc… all at around 160 million a year. Even Brentford are over 130 million.

Clearly we don’t know who wants or will ask for a new contract but we all know what agents are like and just off the top of my head I’d imagine all of Roefs, Hume, Ballard, Sadiki, Talbi etc… are on considerably less then their performances are worth either because they were with us before promotion or because they were low profile when they came to us.

Brobbey, Le Fee, Mukiele etc… are supposedly our highest earners along with Xhaka at 70-80k a week but again their performances would easily make them 100k+ players at other clubs.

We’ve talked a bit about potentially selling to reinvest if we get huge money but the other dilemma the club may have is we are clearly getting huge value for money in achievement vs our wage bill (The exact analysis the times article were showing). That’s probably not going to last indefinitely with the current crop as by definition our young, emerging prospects will want bigger and better wages now they are established and that may domino to our current higher earners.

Probably 8-10 players I can think of that would potentially have a strong case. Something the club may have to build in to our squad plans this summer as it’s possible before even a penny is spent that just keeping this squad together for next year will take an investment in itself.
According to 2 AI bots Bournemouth are under 70m.
No mention of Brentford but would assume less
 
Back
Top