Batth to Norwich ** confirmed **

[MadMackem10]

He’s the better defender for me, Ballard and him

He’s looked miles off the pace since his injury. Looked shocking in pre season when he played

 

[NLawton]

This is a really weird transfer considering he was our player of the year mind. I only imagine the Stoke clause has something to do with this.

 

[johnny kayo]

Confirmed on SAFC Twitter

 

[Johnny3773]

Confirmed Batth to Norwich

 

[Doberman]

Really disappointed with this one

 

[JackL]

Really?

O'Nien and Ballard have been excellent during the last 2 matches.

Baath is 3rd choice at best.

Player of the year last year

 

[SAFC7391]

Good luck to him, would of happily kept him but clearly that wasn’t going to happen, only wish him the best of luck except against us of course.

 

[Scorer]

Slightly disappointing, especially given the CB injury carnage we’ve had the last few seasons. One short there now imo.

 

[Dodgy]

Player of the year last year

Irrespective of whether he won it or not, he wasn't our player of the year.

It was always an odd one, for me. Clarke and Amad were head and shoulders above him. I'd much rather he stayed but no way was he (or any of our leaky defence) our best player last year.

IMHO, of course.

 

[mackembhoy]

Agree. If the model is pedalling our player of the season and replacing him with a child, then it's not right.

He's been replaced with a CM that got converted to a RB that got converted to a CB.

That being said I hope Seelt or Trianatis are better than 09 and Baath. We've still got Alese to come back too.

 

[Kenna]

Disgusting decision to sell him given the two new lads clearly aren't even close to being ready and O'Nein not being a CB.

 

[JackL]

Irrespective of whether he won it or not, he wasn't our player of the year.

It was always an odd one, for me. Clarke and Amad were head and shoulders above him. I'd much rather he stayed but no way was he (or any of our leaky defence) our best player last year.

IMHO, of course.

At the very least you'd have him as first choice at cb though. Well I would along with ballard

 

[CEF]

Absolutely baffling
One ALS and RaWA need to answer after chasing our previous owners

 

[jesus juice]

Ah well. Haway the lads

 

[craigypants]

Bit of a kick in the balls at the death. Especially letting a promotion rival have him...odd choice in my opinion.

 

[mackembhoy]

Disgusting decision to sell him given the two new lads clearly aren't even close to being ready and O'Nein not being a CB.

Seelt has been injured mind. He's been playing second division Dutch football

If he's not better at CB than 09 then we may as well terminate his deal.

 

[Hongkongphooey]

Crackers decision, hope to God that Ballard and O'nien stay fit because the two young lads that we have signed look nowhere near ready to be starting games.

 

[YES WE GYAN]

Would have been useful against Millwall etc but correct to let him go, given how we're trying to play at the back, rather than keep him as a sub.

Would have done more harm keeping him to have a section of the fans chanting his name every time we concede a goal.

 

[Dodgy]

At the very least you'd have him as first choice at cb though. Well I would along with ballard

I tend to agree but I still don't have him as player of the year.

 

[sidneyeric]

He's not gone anywhere and he'll play tomorrow, calm down lads.

Aye ?