• The forums will be unavailable for a few hours on Saturday 6th June, when they do return they will initially be in a degraded state with some features missing, but normal posting/reading will be possible. The main website will not be affected by these updates.
    New user registrations are currently disabled.
    Some other features of the forum are also currently disabled.

Artemis 2 Going back to the moon.


I was very excited when I heard about this launch given there were 4K cameras and livestream etc, but let’s be honest if this was indeed real then surely they would have turned the cameras towards the windows so we can have a look at the view. I’m in the it’s fake camp, but I’m also not a flat earth gajee.
 
I was very excited when I heard about this launch given there were 4K cameras and livestream etc, but let’s be honest if this was indeed real then surely they would have turned the cameras towards the windows so we can have a look at the view. I’m in the it’s fake camp, but I’m also not a flat earth gajee.
serious question. Who gains from faking it? What's the reason?
 
serious question. Who gains from faking it? What's the reason?
You could say there was a reason to fake the moon landings in the 60s. There was a space race with Russia which Russia was winning. But there is no reason whatsoever to fake this. It would be absolutely pointless with nothing to gain.
 
It's possible for people with the right setup to bounce lasers off the reflectors Armstrong and Aldrin left on the moon in 1969
Lets not ignore the independent verification of the moon landings by competing nations, who were able to track the missions. The UK played a big part in the tracking and comms (as did Australia), because the rotation of the earth prevents America constantly facing the moon. Including those who independently verified the first landing, was Russia who landed an unmanned probe on the moon the very same day. This is the nation who had the biggest motivation to try and prove it was faked. How did NASA fake telemetry into Russian monitoring stations?

And despite everything that has happened in the world since 1969, not one person involved or one nation either angry with or competing with the USA have come out and said "time we told the truth". All the different leaks, all the different governments, all the different wars, different loony presidents, not one person or nation has said it is time to discredit the USA's greatest achievement. Not likely is it?
 
Conspiracy theorists adopt these beliefs because it makes them feel special, to the rest of us it just makes them look and sound 'special'.
Yet they seem to get more attention than most of the ‘regular’ posts. I don’t know why people don’t just ignore them. Replying on a messageboard isn’t going to change anyone’s opinion.
 
Serious answer I have no idea.
The answer is they are hiding our true realm and who created it. We all live in which is based on a flat stationary Plain covered with a firminment dome and pressuried. Operations in around 1948ish were all attempts to shash the dome but all failed as all rockets ever since. NASA was formed By Crowly, Parsons and Von Braun who were all practicing devil worshippers. NASA job was to decive the wrold and stop the masses having a central god like figure who would be stronger than the controlling governments
 
The answer is they are hiding our true realm and who created it. We all live in which is based on a flat stationary Plain covered with a firminment dome and pressuried. Operations in around 1948ish were all attempts to shash the dome but all failed as all rockets ever since. NASA was formed By Crowly, Parsons and Von Braun who were all practicing devil worshippers. NASA job was to decive the wrold and stop the masses having a central god like figure who would be stronger than the controlling governments
You’re a f***ing lunatic.
 
Back
Top