• The first stage of the forum upgrades has now been completed but they remain in a degraded state with some features missing, normal posting/reading should now be possible.
    Please read this thread for more details.
    New user registrations are currently disabled.
    Some other features of the forum are also currently disabled.

Andy Jacobs talkSPORT


I thought their club report was less than gracious but that just bile from Jacob’s

"A side determined to stifle our attack"

So are we just supposed to let them play how they want? The top clubs seem to be shocked that teams are deploying tactics against them, see Slot complaining that everyone sits deep and plays the long ball when they play Liverpool.
 
I care not what Andy Jacobs thinks, one iota. He needs to just keep celebrating being the club world champions…. gufffffaw!
 
I thought their club report was less than gracious but that just bile from Jacob’s


Ive read….
“Sunderland looked intent to push forwards”
And….
“The mackems shut up shop”
Within a few lines of each other.

Honestly, i dont feel we defended for our lives, Paul Merson said we genuinely had a go and I feel that as well.

I think the problem is that these clubs genuinely cant accept this sort of loss, their media teams struggle to be creative without upsetting their glory hunting fans, it has to be all about slating the other side rather than looking at their own team.
 
Apart from Jacobs being wrong, it's all just a bit tedious and performative.

Every unexpected Chelsea loss or England Cricket team loss and it's a "let's go to Andy see what he thinks" and there follows a "new" rant.

Same tired old act
 
Apart from Jacobs being wrong, it's all just a bit tedious and performative.

Every unexpected Chelsea loss or England Cricket team loss and it's a "let's go to Andy see what he thinks" and there follows a "new" rant.

Same tired old act
We'll miss him when he retires :lol:
 
Anyone hear his little rant on us just there on talkSPORT the bitter little bastard, we didn’t want to win the game, everything was played long, only won cos Chelsea were poor
Anyone ring in to tell him we win the xG game too?

Chelsea were shite cos we made them look shite. It's a common theme in our games at the minute 😁
 
Let's be honest it's Hawksbury who carries the whole show, even he just seems a bit bored with it all.
Jacobs provides virtually nothing of note and never has really.
Paul Hawksbee is a normal football fan and a good and funny presenter. Andy Jacobs is the miserable, entitled straight man.

I've always liked their show and don't take it seriously, they are both well known comedy writers after all.
 
Paul Hawksbee is a normal football fan and a good and funny presenter. Andy Jacobs is the miserable, entitled straight man.

I've always liked their show and don't take it seriously, they are both well known comedy writers after all.
Even when doing the writing etc for other shows it was clearly PH who was the writer with AJ the producer( though could be wrong on this bit) ,hence his writing for Harry Hill, no Jacobs there !

Paul quick witted and still funny...Jacobs isn't.
 
Apart from Jacobs being wrong, it's all just a bit tedious and performative.

Every unexpected Chelsea loss or England Cricket team loss and it's a "let's go to Andy see what he thinks" and there follows a "new" rant.

Same tired old act
TBF mate, he's did it for 25 years :lol: . He probably started being genuine (and probably still is :lol:) but he does play up to his grumpy reputation. Do like the bloke and him and Paul have been one of my favourite double acts ;)
 
Even when doing the writing etc for other shows it was clearly PH who was the writer with AJ the producer( though could be wrong on this bit) ,hence his writing for Harry Hill, no Jacobs there !

Paul quick witted and still funny...Jacobs isn't.
Yeah, Andy has always been a producer in programmes such as Fantasy Football and Channel 4 Daily.

Paul has written for loads of people, even Frankie Howerd back in the day! They make a great combination IMO.
 
Back
Top