• The forums will be unavailable for a few hours on Saturday 6th June, when they do return they will initially be in a degraded state with some features missing, but normal posting/reading will be possible. The main website will not be affected by these updates.
    New user registrations are currently disabled.
    Some other features of the forum are also currently disabled.

Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor arrested


Its just guesswork anyway. For some reason the palace wont release who payed what. Very strange
It is and there is most definitely an ulterior motive behind it, but we don't know if that motive is because Charlie gave him money or because they don't want to besmirch Lizzies name any further than this scandal has already done. I doubt it would implicate William as he supposedly hates Andrew so I can't see him handing over any money to the cause, but you never know.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MSC

In the extremely unlikely event of him succeeding to the throne there would be a constitutional crisis of such enormity that it would probably result in the end of he monarchy anyway. So bring it on.
When Harry left he lost security details etc and he is still in the accession. I want him removed because all they are is a ceremonial frippery so saying there is no point because it is a ceremonial frippery is of no weight.
It should be done because it is the right thing to do first and foremost.
It should also be done as he should be absolutely removed from any benefits that we know nothing about but exist.
Are you happy that the tax payer funds Handy's personal security?
On this... that boy was signed up without his consent, his mother hounded to death and then the govt demanded he walk behind her coffin for PR.
That he needs a security detail is due to the nonsense he had no choice in. Yes I think the govt that encourages the nonsense should pay for it.
The NI secretary had life long security, they chose that role as adults. He was public property from conception.
 
Last edited:
In the extremely unlikely event of him succeeding to the throne there would be a constitutional crisis of such enormity that it would probably result in the end of he monarchy anyway. So bring it on.

The only way Porky would succeed to the throne would be if we had a rash of ' suicides ' even more surprising and shocking that that of his mate Epstein.
 
I’m not against having a king and a much smaller royal family than we currently have, but I do think this is the beginning of the end for them.

Removing Andrew from the line is just a waste of valuable parliamentary time. The chances of him becoming King whilst banged up in the scrubs is slim . Can he not just remove himself?
 
When Harry left he lost security details etc and he is still in the accession. I want him removed because all they are is a ceremonial frippery so saying there is no point because it is a ceremonial frippery is of no weight.
It should be done because it is the right thing to do first and foremost.
It should also be done as he should be absolutely removed from any benefits that we know nothing about but exist.

On this... that boy was signed up without his consent, his mother hounded to death and then the govt demanded he walk behind her coffin for PR.
That he needs a security detail is due to the nonsense he had no choice in. Yes I think the govt that encourages the nonsense should pay for it.
The NI secretary had life long security, they chose that role as adults. He was public property from conception.
What's that got to do with my post? 🤷‍♂️
 
Just seen something which reminded me, Brendan and his fivehead have form in this arena. Ooh look at me! Aren't I edgy! Aren't I such an edgy boy! Woof!

View attachment 26021

Questions to be asked about someone like Brendan who defends Saville and sticks up for a sleazeball who paid out £12 million for what he claims he didn't do to a then17 year old, had all his titles and privileges removed, ostracised by his family and is being investigated by the police.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top