• The forums will be unavailable for a few hours on Saturday 6th June, when they do return they will initially be in a degraded state with some features missing, but normal posting/reading will be possible. The main website will not be affected by these updates.
    New user registrations are currently disabled.
    Some other features of the forum are also currently disabled.

Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor arrested

So a relatively minor royal has lost his titles and is now a commoner , he gets arrested and interviewed by the police and no charges have arisen yet , but some of the SMB massive are calling for the demise of the Royal family en masse and a minor revolution.

What doesn’t everyone calm down and let the legal system come to a conclusion first.
 

Georgewhitt said:
I said he didn't pay to keep him out of court you clownshoe.

How many fuckin times does someone have to answer your same fuckin questions man?

You are boring the shit out of me now.

Go stick you hoop licking tongue up Madelsons arse, if you can prize Starmers out first.

Bye.
Click to expand...
I have told you my views on mandelson and starmer. Yet you cannot bring yourself to admit that you think its ok for king nonce protecter to pay to keep andrew out of court,and pay him a healthy yearly salary. Know wonder you are so upset,you are probably angry with yourself when i hoy a few home truths your way
 
Skylon said:
I have told you my views on mandelson and starmer. Yet you cannot bring yourself to admit that you think its ok for king nonce protecter to pay to keep andrew out of court,and pay him a healthy yearly salary. Know wonder you are so upset,you are probably angry with yourself when i hoy a few home truths your way
Click to expand...
I am not answering those questions again.

It's boring. I've answered both numerous times, and he did not pay to keep him out of court.

Read my answers. They have been given plenty of times.

If you can't manage it, get someone to read and explain them to you

I've got a Cocker Spaniel that learned how to give me a paw faster than it takes you to digest information 🤣
 
Last edited:
buster said:
So a relatively minor royal has lost his titles and is now a commoner , he gets arrested and interviewed by the police and no charges have arisen yet , but some of the SMB massive are calling for the demise of the Royal family en masse and a minor revolution.

What doesn’t everyone calm down and let the legal system come to a conclusion first.
Click to expand...

Nobody - absolutely nobody - should be above the law. We have a fundamental problem with that in this country owing to the law being in the name of the Crown.

Good job the King's beyond reproach, eh?

You must be logged on to see external links
 
Georgewhitt said:
What I find comical about this, is that you and I are on a completely different page when it comes to the Monarchy, but we both agree totally that he is a clownshoe. 🤣🤣🤣
Click to expand...
My best mates are really right wing... I don't hate people for their views but I really do take exception to people who can't support their views. Say what you like, think what you like, but if I challenge you on it you'd best be able to defend it and maybe even change my views, teach me something.

This clownshoe is incapable of even understanding his statements and he discredits them with his stupidity.

I'm against a monarchy... but for the correct reasons, in my view, which I can argue. Just because he is apparently "on the same side" as me I won't tolerate it. He has squandered his life and can not even form one of the easiest arguments to make in politics.
 
CatRyan said:
My best mates are really right wing... I don't hate people for their views but I really do take exception to people who can't support their views. Say what you like, think what you like, but if I challenge you on it you'd best be able to defend it and maybe even change my views, teach me something.

This clownshoe is incapable of even understanding his statements and he discredits them with his stupidity.

I'm against a monarchy... but for the correct reasons, in my view, which I can argue. Just because he is apparently "on the same side" as me I won't tolerate it. He has squandered his life and can not even form one of the easiest arguments to make in politics.
Click to expand...
I no longer have any political affiliation at all. My own views are probably centre, but have no faith in the political system, or more accurately the politicians themselves.

I am a Royalist, but see the arguments against, some valid and some not imo.

The issue with situations like now, is that you get the knee jerk extremes on both sides howling, yet when pressed to explain, they have little other than the emotional side to fall back on
 
Georgewhitt said:
I am not answering those questions again.

It's boring. I've answered both numerous times, and he did not pay to keep him out of court.

Read my answers. They have been given plenty of times.

If you can't manage it, get someone to read and explain them to you

I've got a Cocker Spaniel that learned how to give me a paw faster than it takes you to digest information 🤣
Click to expand...
You still havent answered a simple question.Why do you want charles to stay on,when he is knee deep in this scandal. Paying the nonce out of his own( well,ours) pocket. You already said its wrong.
CatRyan said:
My best mates are really right wing... I don't hate people for their views but I really do take exception to people who can't support their views. Say what you like, think what you like, but if I challenge you on it you'd best be able to defend it and maybe even change my views, teach me something.

This clownshoe is incapable of even understanding his statements and he discredits them with his stupidity.

I'm against a monarchy... but for the correct reasons, in my view, which I can argue. Just because he is apparently "on the same side" as me I won't tolerate it. He has squandered his life and can not even form one of the easiest arguments to make in politics.
Click to expand...
Stop being so self important you moron. People can have different reasons for being against something,cant they?
 
Last edited:
Georgewhitt said:
I no longer have any political affiliation at all. My own views are probably centre, but have no faith in the political system, or more accurately the politicians themselves.

I am a Royalist, but see the arguments against, some valid and some not imo.

The issue with situations like now, is that you get the knee jerk extremes on both sides howling, yet when pressed to explain, they have little other than the emotional side to fall back on
Click to expand...


Gives fragile men and their feelings a bad name so it does 🤣
 
Georgewhitt said:
I no longer have any political affiliation at all. My own views are probably centre, but have no faith in the political system, or more accurately the politicians themselves.

I am a Royalist, but see the arguments against, some valid and some not imo.

The issue with situations like now, is that you get the knee jerk extremes on both sides howling, yet when pressed to explain, they have little other than the emotional side to fall back on
Click to expand...
You seem to have a problem with mandelson and starmer. Yet not with the nonce and king tampon. Its rank hypocrisy
 
Monty Pigeon said:
Nobody - absolutely nobody - should be above the law. We have a fundamental problem with that in this country owing to the law being in the name of the Crown.

Good job the King's beyond reproach, eh?

You must be logged on to see external links
Click to expand...
aye but those 3 big republics, China, the States and Russia are all shining examples ;). Doesn't matter what system it is the rich are always going to have the power imho
 
Georgewhitt said:
Never said that, but you just keep making stuff up marra.

That's generally what happens when you lose an argument, as evidenced 2 or 3 times on this thread alone.🤣
Click to expand...
I gave up with him he's a total waste of time. I usually give the obvious trolls on here a couple of replies then fuck them off. I stupidly kept replying to him though before ending the conversation.
He keeps persisting with Charlie paid off Virginia Giuffre even though there is no evidence he did. When you ask him to post a link to his source ( it's the sun newspaper ) he doesn't reply. Just comes back with more straw man bollocks to attack you. As you said "just keep making stuff up marra". It's what he does best.
 
John Steed said:
I gave up with him he's a total waste of time. I usually give the obvious trolls on here a couple of replies then fuck them off. I stupidly kept replying to him though before ending the conversation.
He keeps persisting with Charlie paid off Virginia Giuffre even though there is no evidence he did. When you ask him to post a link to his source ( it's the sun newspaper ) he doesn't reply. Just comes back with more straw man bollocks to attack you. As you said "just keep making stuff up marra". It's what he does best.
Click to expand...
You think its that much of a stretch for a bloke thats paying his noncey brother an annual wage,to have chipped in with his ma? I don't. He'll have at least had a role to play in the decision. It stinks
 
Skylon said:
You think its that much of a stretch for a bloke thats paying his noncey brother an annual wage,to have chipped in with his ma? I don't. He'll have at least had a role to play in the decision. It stinks
Click to expand...
You think that's proof? Seriously mate just give it up. It's like you're up in court and the evidence is you look a bit shifty. It's that crackers.:lol:
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top