Pete the Pirate
Midfield
Minneapolis: Daunte Wright killing was 'accidental' say police
Tear gas is fired and an overnight curfew imposed amid anger at the fatal shooting of Daunte Wright.
www.bbc.com
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It’s funny how it’s pinned on ‘trump’ so early in the thread, the blokes an absolute shit pimp but these things were happening well before him and evidently going to happen long after he’s gone.
So who do you think should lay down their arms first?I'm not blaming it on Trump or saying it wasn't happening before him, but the US police force as does the Army has a lot of right wingers and Republican voters, disproportionality so.
But I did mention in my post the problem is a gun culture problem in the US and I don't know how it can solved when there are 400 million guns lying about in circulation it means you're always going to have a police force that's equally violent in response itself and situations like this are going to keep happening.
So who do you think should lay down their arms first?
So you are saying that after a policeman as shot someone and it’s hit the headlines everyone else should lay down their arms first Good luck with that theory.In a civilised country, the 2nd amendment would be repealed and a massive buyback program would be implemented recovering the vast majority of those 400+ million guns. Then in time the US police can be retrained in less violent methods of engagement with the public.
The only people who should be permitted to ever owning guns in a society are the police and the army as far as I'm concerned and nobody else.
So you are saying that after a policeman as shot someone and it’s hit the headlines everyone else should lay down their arms first Good luck with that theory.
So you are saying that after a policeman as shot someone and it’s hit the headlines everyone else should lay down their arms first Good luck with that theory.
Yes of course I'm saying that. Why should ordinary members of the public be able to buy guns and dangerous weaponry?
There isn't a single valid reason for citizens being armed with guns, let alone semi-automatic rifles etc.So who do you think should lay down their arms first?
Because the criminals will shoot them. Like you say 400million guns.Yes of course I'm saying that. Why should ordinary members of the public be able to buy guns and dangerous weaponry?
Gun regulations like in this country only stop law abiding citizens owning them. It’s a good thing but my point is they are too far gone for either of the 3 sides to lay them downBecause the criminals will shoot them. Like you say 400million guns.
So no one as ever been shot by a criminal?There isn't a single valid reason for citizens being armed with guns, let alone semi-automatic rifles etc.
Not really but blasting unarmed people away doesn’t help doesn’t help does it.so are you suggesting the police lay down their weapons and go out unarmed? and that would lead to the general public laying down their guns, not robbing fuck out of everyone?
I don’t recall saying words to that effect.So no one as ever been shot by a criminal?
If everyone has access to gun. F*****g rights am I.I don’t recall saying words to that effect.
Using that logic, are you saying everyone everywhere should be armed because someone has been shot by a criminal before?
Would you buy one if you moved there?The whole gun control thing is never ending..I was reading about Illinois..specifically Chicago where gun crime was/is out of control..so to tighten things up..to be able to buy a handgun in Illinois you need..
1.To be an Illinois resident over 21.
2.A valid Firearms owner ID card.
3.A valid state ID or drivers license.
So the local government will say ‘look what we’ve put in place’..all the criminals do is go over the border into Indiana and buy them there..never ending.
Would you buy one if you moved there?
And the Second Amendment was written into the Constitution exactly to counteract the inevitable consequences of that sort of thinking.In a civilised country, the 2nd amendment would be repealed and a massive buyback program would be implemented recovering the vast majority of those 400+ million guns. Then in time the US police can be retrained in less violent methods of engagement with the public.
The only people who should be permitted to ever owning guns in a society are the police and the army as far as I'm concerned and nobody else.
No. of course I wouldn't.If everyone has access to gun. F*****g rights am I.
would you own one if you moved there?
No. of course I wouldn't.
Having a gun does nothing to save you from harm. For proof see the almost infinite amount of shootings that have taken place, none of which were ever prevented by a bystander with a gun