So do I. I don’t wish him any ill. I just don’t think he deserved any more than he got. Who was he better than to deserve more of a chance??We'll see how he gets on at Portsmouth. I hope he does well.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
So do I. I don’t wish him any ill. I just don’t think he deserved any more than he got. Who was he better than to deserve more of a chance??We'll see how he gets on at Portsmouth. I hope he does well.
Most of this place had him down as their man of the match against Stoke, and he was one of our better players against Sheff Utd too. He hasn't exactly blown the opposition away, no, but I never said he was a worldbeater. He's played well when given minutes.“He did his best” I’m not questioning his effort or desire I just don’t think he’s anywhere near good enough to play for our team as anything more than a bit part player in an injury crisis. If he’s that good a better team than Portsmouth would be in for him.
Jesus well if that’s him being “great” then he’s not very good at all. He was awful against his new club. Average at Stoke. Decent against Sheff Utd, but “best player” Haway man. Mayenda and Isidor were streets ahead of him as “the best player” and even in that game he was flagging after an hour. No more than a bit part player.
Most of this place did did they? They are the experts on here after all! Okay well put it this way. Is he better than our first choice CMs? No. Is he better than Mundle, Watson and Le Fee? No. Do we play with a 10? No. So where was he supposed to get more of a chance?Most of this place had him down as their man of the match against Stoke, and he was one of our better players against Sheff Utd too. He hasn't exactly blown the opposition away, no, but I never said he was a worldbeater. He's played well when given minutes.
Very few according to Le Bris and folks like you, I don't think he let the team down at all in the games he played recently. He merited better treatment in my view and did well considering he's not a winger. I'd like to have seen him link up with Le Fee again but ain't gonna happen now.So do I. I don’t wish him any ill. I just don’t think he deserved any more than he got. Who was he better than to deserve more of a chance??
Evidently they've got a better eye than you, pal. I personally think he should be starting on the left with Le Fee played in his natural position in the centre, at least until Mundle returns. Regis evidently disagrees though. I see him as a capable backup player that I'd be happy to have cover for injuries and come on as a sub. Fair play to him if he's not happy with that, I don't begrudge him the move, but I definitely think he still had a role to play here. All of this has digressed from my original point anyway, which was that you were being a smug arse saying people only think he's good because they don't remember seeing him. Well I do remember seeing him, because he was regularly starting just a few weeks back. And I think he's a decent player.Most of this place did did they? They are the experts on here after all! Okay well put it this way. Is he better than our first choice CMs? No. Is he better than Mundle, Watson and Le Fee? No. Do we play with a 10? No. So where was he supposed to get more of a chance?
Just answer who he should have played ahead of. Nice lad, tries his best, let no one down. All nice things and true. But doesn’t get you “more of a chance” in a top team. So who was he better than to get more of a chance?Very few according to Le Bris and folks like you, I don't think he let the team down at all in the games he played recently. He merited better treatment in my view and did well considering he's not a winger. I'd like to have seen him link up with Le Fee again but ain't gonna happen now.
And he was crap against Portsmouth in his last game and got hooked. Blowing after an hour against Sheff Utd. Played okay against a pretty awful Stoke side. Even in those three games. Flashes but zero consistency. If he’s so good why is no one better than Portsmouth in for him? He doesn’t want to sit around be a back up player.Evidently they've got a better eye than you, pal. I personally think he should be starting on the left with Le Fee played in his natural position in the centre, at least until Mundle returns. Regis evidently disagrees though. I see him as a capable backup player that I'd be happy to have cover for injuries and come on as a sub. Fair play to him if he's not happy with that, I don't begrudge him the move, but I definitely think he still had a role to play here. All of this has digressed from my original point anyway, which was that you were being a smug arse saying people only think he's good because they don't remember seeing him. Well I do remember seeing him, because he was regularly starting just a few weeks back. And I think he's a decent player.
Is Portsmouth buying him or is it just a loanJust answer who he should have played ahead of. Nice lad, tries his best, let no one down. All nice things and true. But doesn’t get you “more of a chance” in a top team. So who was he better than to get more of a chance?
And he was crap against Portsmouth in his last game and got hooked. Blowing after an hour against Sheff Utd. Played okay against a pretty awful Stoke side. Even in those three games. Flashes but zero consistency. If he’s so good why is no one better than Portsmouth in for him? He doesn’t want to sit around be a back up player.
Also. Which midfielder are you sacrificing? You’re honestly sacrificing one of Jobe, Neil and Rigg to her Aouchice in. Crikey.
Well we didn't play him until we had loads of injuries and even then when he did well he was out of the team. He really couldn't win could he? Le Bris should have played him in the Plymouth game and put Le Fee in the middle and not started Samed. None of us are saying he's better on the wing than Mundle or Watson but that he's a good option when injuries inevitably occur.Just answer who he should have played ahead of. Nice lad, tries his best, let no one down. All nice things and true. But doesn’t get you “more of a chance” in a top team. So who was he better than to get more of a chance?
LoanIs Portsmouth buying him or is it just a loan
So he be back next seasonLoan
You’re having a go at him but he himself said “backup player”.Just answer who he should have played ahead of. Nice lad, tries his best, let no one down. All nice things and true. But doesn’t get you “more of a chance” in a top team. So who was he better than to get more of a chance?
And he was crap against Portsmouth in his last game and got hooked. Blowing after an hour against Sheff Utd. Played okay against a pretty awful Stoke side. Even in those three games. Flashes but zero consistency. If he’s so good why is no one better than Portsmouth in for him? He doesn’t want to sit around be a back up player.
Also. Which midfielder are you sacrificing? You’re honestly sacrificing one of Jobe, Neil and Rigg to her Aouchice in. Crikey.
Loan end of seasonIs Portsmouth buying him or is it just a loan
I’d imagine he’ll be away permanently in the summer.So he be back next season
I rather it was a permanent dealLoan end of season
The earlier statements centred on him deserving more of a chance and being hard done to and he should have played more. Yet no one can answer who should have made way for him. Also pretty selfish to expect a footballer to hang around as a back up. When Mundle and Watson are back he’d not even get on the bench.You’re having a go at him but he himself said “backup player”.
Where did I mention Jobe Neil and Rigg. The player I mentioned was Samed. Keep up, stop inventing stuff.Just answer who he should have played ahead of. Nice lad, tries his best, let no one down. All nice things and true. But doesn’t get you “more of a chance” in a top team. So who was he better than to get more of a chance?
And he was crap against Portsmouth in his last game and got hooked. Blowing after an hour against Sheff Utd. Played okay against a pretty awful Stoke side. Even in those three games. Flashes but zero consistency. If he’s so good why is no one better than Portsmouth in for him? He doesn’t want to sit around be a back up player.
Also. Which midfielder are you sacrificing? You’re honestly sacrificing one of Jobe, Neil and Rigg to her Aouchice in. Crikey.
When being the operative word.The earlier statements centred on him deserving more of a chance and being hard done to and he should have played more. Yet no one can answer who should have made way for him. Also pretty selfish to expect a footballer to hang around as a back up. When Mundle and Watson are back he’d not even get on the bench.
So you’d have played Aouchice on left, Le Fee in middle and binned off Rigg? Totally disagree. Rigg should have played. Le Fee on the left is better than Aouchiche on the left.Well we didn't play him until we had loads of injuries and even then when he did well he was out of the team. He really couldn't win could he? Le Bris should have played him in the Plymouth game and put Le Fee in the middle and not started Samed. None of us are saying he's better on the wing than Mundle or Watson but that he's a good option when injuries inevitably occur.
They’re back soon enough. 17 games left. Aouchice would have done well to play more than 2 of them.When being the operative word.
So from the team on Saturday Samed out and Aouchice in. You’ve still lost Rigg. Only got 11 players mate.Where did I mention Jobe Neil and Rigg. The player I mentioned was Samed. Keep up, stop inventing stuff.
None of the midfielders played well in the Plymouth game except Le Fee in the first half. Rigg has been injured and needs managing. We'll never know if Aouchiche would have made a difference but he couldn't have done any worse.So you’d have played Aouchice on left, Le Fee in middle and binned off Rigg? Totally disagree. Rigg should have played. Le Fee on the left is better than Aouchiche on the left.